Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999591›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2016

Endoscopic Management of the Difficult Bile Duct Stones: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.

Bülent Ödemiş, Ufuk Barış Kuzu, Erkin Öztaş, Fatih Saygılı, Nuretdin Suna, Orhan Coskun, Adem Aksoy, Zeliha Sırtaş, Derya Arı, Yener Akpınar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611840 (Randomized Trial Comparing One-stage Robotic Approach Versus Two-stage Endo-laparoscopic Approach for Difficult Choledocholithiasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611840 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial Comparing One-stage Robotic Approach Versus Two-stage Endo-laparoscopic Approach for Difficult Choledocholithiasis (REAL Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2023 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsCholedocholithiasisArmsRobotic surgery, Endo-laparoscopic surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bülent ÖdemişDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ufuk Barış KuzuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6763-791X
Erkin ÖztaşDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-7492
Fatih SaygılıDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Nuretdin SunaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Orhan CoskunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Adem AksoyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Zeliha SırtaşDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Derya ArıDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Yener AkpınarDepartment of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID27999591
PMCPMC5143714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.