ArticleOchsner journal2016
The Close Exposure to Radiology Program: Educational Benefits to Medical Students.
Article in Ochsner journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiology clerkships during medical school provide a suboptimal training experience in the Chinese medical doctor training program. Staff radiologists are heavily occupied with clinic tasks which decreases teaching quality. The close exposure to radiology program (CERP) is a novel pathway designed to improve teaching quality, yet students' expectations of the potential benefits of such a program and their willingness to join CERP still have not been investigated among Chinese medical students.
methodsA survey was conducted among medical students of both sexes with various majors and at different levels of training. The students were asked to identify the potential benefits of CERP as well as to indicate if they were willing to join CERP.
resultsOf the 1,600 surveys distributed to medical students, 1,394 were returned and analyzed. Most of the returned surveys were from males (1,268, 91%), and most respondents had not had a radiology clerkship experience (1,376, 99%). Most responding students were in a 5-year training program (94%) and in their third grade of training (41%). More than 60% of the surveyed students acknowledged each of the 5 benefits listed on the survey, although no statistically significant differences were seen between sexes, training grades, those with and without prior radiology experience, program length, or majors in how the questions were answered. Students most willing to participate in CERP were those enrolled in a 5-year training program (71%) and those who had previous radiology clerkship experience (89%). Students least willing to join CERP were majoring in somatology medicine (54%) and medical psychology (55%), and only 45% of students in 8-year programs indicated a willingness to join CERP. Chi-square tests indicated that the willingness to join CERP was not associated with sex (χ
conclusionMedical students enrolled at Fourth Military Medical University developed an awareness of the potential benefits of CERP; however, this awareness did not correlate with their willingness to join CERP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27999509PMC5158157W2585410948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.