Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999480›Full record

ArticleMateria socio-medica2016

THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT ON HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS' QUALITY OF LIFE.

Margarita Alexopoulou, Natalia Giannakopoulou, Eleni Komna, Victoria Alikari, Georgia Toulia, Maria Polikandrioti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materia socio-medica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. SAGE open medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Qualitative study on the sense of meaning in life in uremic patients undergoing initial hemodialysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margarita AlexopoulouDepartment of Nursing, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Natalia GiannakopoulouDepartment of Nursing, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eleni KomnaDepartment of Nursing, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Victoria AlikariDepartment of Nursing, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgia TouliaDepartment of Nursing, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maria PolikandriotiDepartment of Nursing, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssociation between perceived social support and quality of life in hemodialysis patients represents a new area of interest.

aimThe aim of this study was to explore the effect of social support on the quality of life of hemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study 258 hemodialysis patients were enrolled. Data was collected using a questionnaire which consisted of three parts: a) the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) to assess perceived social support, b) the Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index (MVQOLI-15) to assess quality of patients' life and c) the socio-demographic, clinical and other variables of patients. To test the existence of association between quality of life and social support the correlation coefficient of Spearman was used. Multiple linear regression was performed to estimate the effect of social support on quality of life (dependent variable), adjusted for potential confounders. The analysis was performed on SPSS v20.

resultsPatients felt high support from significant others and family and less from friends (median 6, 6 and 4.5 respectively). Patients evaluated their quality of life in its entirety as moderate in the total and "overall quality of life" score (median 17.2 and 3 respectively). Regarding the association between social support and quality of life, results showed that the more support patients had from their significant others, family and friends, the better quality of life they had. (rho =0,395, rho =0,399 and rho=0,359, respectively).

conclusionsUnderstanding the relation between social support and quality of life should prompt health professionals to provide beneficial care to hemodialysis patients.

Indexed as

Bosnia and Herzegovinaceliac diseaseepidemiologygluten enteropathyhemodialysisincidenceprevalencequality of lifesocial support

Identifiers

PMID27999480
PMCPMC5149438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.