Precursor-directed in situ synthesis of Saccharothriolides G and H by the Actinomycete Saccharothrix sp. A1506.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Mechanistic study of the retro-aza-Michael reaction in saccharothriolide L: identification of 2-amino-4-methylphenol as an effective protecting tool for the Michael acceptor.The Journal of antibiotics · 2024
   Article
2. Structurally diverse metabolites from the rare actinobacterium Saccharothrix xinjiangensis.The Journal of antibiotics · 2020
   Article
3. Marine Rare Actinobacteria: Isolation, Characterization, and Strategies for Harnessing Bioactive Compounds.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as