Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999342›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Perception of Environmental Risks and Health Promotion Attitudes of French Perinatal Health Professionals.

Cécile Marie, Didier Lémery, Françoise Vendittelli, Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women about endocrine disruptors.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Physician Training Related to Environmental Hazards near Ash Superfund Sites.European journal of environment and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. How to Educate Pregnant Women about Endocrine Disruptors?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Human Fetal Growth.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cécile MarieEA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne, 28 Place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France. cmarie@chu-clermontferrand.fr.
Didier LémeryEA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne, 28 Place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France. dlemery@chu-clermontferrand.fr.
Françoise VendittelliEA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne, 28 Place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France. fvendittelli@chu-clermontferrand.fr.
Marie-Pierre Sauvant-RochatEA 4681, PEPRADE, Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne, 28 Place Henri-Dunant BP 38, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France. m-pierre.sauvant-rochat@udamail.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exposure of pregnant women to environmental contaminants is a subject of international concern. However, the risk perception of these contaminants by health professionals (HP) has not been extensively investigated. The main objective of the PERI-HELPE study (Perception of Risk-HEaLth Professionals & Environment Study) was to assess the risk perception of environmental exposure of pregnant women by perinatal HPs. The secondary objectives were to describe the preventive attitudes of perinatal HPs concerning chemicals exposure of pregnant women and to identify the barriers to preventive attitude. A cross-sectional study was performed in 2015 in France. One hundred eighty-nine HPs (obstetricians, midwives, and general practitioners) replied to an online self-administered questionnaire (participation rate: 11%). Carbon monoxide, pesticides and lead were the contaminants most frequently perceived as a high risk for pregnant women. A minority of HPs asked women about their chemical exposure and advised them to reduce exposure. The lack of information, training and scientific evidence in environmental health were the main difficulties declared by the HPs to advise pregnant women. Despite the low response rate, our findings provide important information to encourage French health authorities to take into account the difficulties encountered by HPs and set up appropriate training programs in Environmental health.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PromotionPerceptionPerinatal CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmentEnvironmental HealthFemaleFranceGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMaternal ExposureMiddle AgedMidwiferyenvironmental chemicalsenvironmental healthperinatal health professionalspreventive attitudereproductive healthrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID27999342
PMCPMC5201396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.