Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999326›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Oral Biofluid Biomarker Research: Current Status and Emerging Frontiers.

Austin Wang, Chris P Wang, Michael Tu, David T W Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Novel impacts of saliva with regard to oral health.The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Salivaomics for Oral Cancer Detection: An Insight.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Optimization of an oral mucosaTissue barriers · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Response of the mouse sublingual gland to spaceflight.European journal of oral sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Austin WangSchool of Dentistry, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. wang25austin@ucla.edu.
Chris P WangSchool of Dentistry, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. chriswang9409@gmail.com.
Michael TuSchool of Dentistry, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. emtu@ucla.edu.
David T W WongSchool of Dentistry, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. dtww@ucla.edu.

Funding

UCLA Dentist-Scientist and Oral Health-Researcher Training ProgramT90DE022734 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WONG, DAVID T · 2012 to 2017
$2.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS T90 DE022734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salivary diagnostics is a rapidly advancing field that offers clinicians and patients the potential of rapid, noninvasive diagnostics with excellent accuracy. In order for the complete realization of the potential of saliva, however, extensive profiling of constituents must be conducted and diagnostic biomarkers must be thoroughly validated. This article briefly overviews the process of conducting a study of salivary biomarkers in a patient cohort and highlights the studies that have been conducted on different classes of molecules in the saliva. Emerging frontiers in salivary diagnostics research that may significantly advance the field will also be highlighted.

Indexed as

biomarkersnoninvasivesalivary diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID27999326
PMCPMC5192520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.