Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999255›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Accelerometry-Based Activity Recognition and Assessment in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Lieven Billiet, Thijs Willem Swinnen, Rene Westhovens, Kurt de Vlam, Sabine Van Huffel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lieven BillietKU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 box 2446, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. lieven.billiet@esat.kuleuven.be.
Thijs Willem SwinnenUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Division of Rheumatology, Herestraat 49 box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. thijs.swinnen@uzleuven.be.
Rene WesthovensUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Division of Rheumatology, Herestraat 49 box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. rene.westhovens@uzleuven.be.
Kurt de VlamUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Division of Rheumatology, Herestraat 49 box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. kurt.devlam@uzleuven.be.
Sabine Van HuffelKU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 box 2446, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. sabine.vanhuffel@esat.kuleuven.be.
KU Leuven · BEiMinds · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the important aspects to be considered in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases is the patient's activity capacity (or performance), defined as the ability to perform a task. Currently, it is assessed by physicians or health professionals mainly by means of a patient-reported questionnaire, sometimes combined with the therapist's judgment on performance-based tasks. This work introduces an approach to assess the activity capacity at home in a more objective, yet interpretable way. It offers a pilot study on 28 patients suffering from axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) to demonstrate its efficacy. Firstly, a protocol is introduced to recognize a limited set of six transition activities in the home environment using a single accelerometer. To this end, a hierarchical classifier with the rejection of non-informative activity segments has been developed drawing on both direct pattern recognition and statistical signal features. Secondly, the recognized activities should be assessed, similarly to the scoring performed by patients themselves. This is achieved through the interval coded scoring (ICS) system, a novel method to extract an interpretable scoring system from data. The activity recognition reaches an average accuracy of 93.5%; assessment is currently 64.3% accurate. These results indicate the potential of the approach; a next step should be its validation in a larger patient study.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAccelerometryAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesTime Factorsaccelerometryactivity capacityactivity performanceactivity recognitioninterpretable medical scoring systemsmonitoringphysical activityphysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID27999255
PMCPMC5191131
OpenAlexW2567328817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.