Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27998289›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016

Effects of low doses of esmolol on cardiac and vascular function in experimental septic shock.

Chaojie Wei, Huguette Louis, Margaux Schmitt, Eliane Albuisson, Sophie Orlowski, Bruno Levy, Antoine Kimmoun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effect of premorbid beta-blockers on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in septic patients: a retrospective study.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Beta-blockers in septic shock: What is new?Journal of intensive medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Mitigating the stress response to improve outcomes for older patients undergoing emergency surgery with the addition of beta-adrenergic blockade.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chaojie WeiINSERM U 1116, Groupe Choc, Equipe 2, Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Huguette LouisUniversité de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Margaux SchmittINSERM U 1116, Groupe Choc, Equipe 2, Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Eliane AlbuissonUniversité de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Sophie OrlowskiINSERM U 1116, Groupe Choc, Equipe 2, Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Bruno LevyINSERM U 1116, Groupe Choc, Equipe 2, Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France. b.levy@chru-nancy.fr.
Antoine KimmounINSERM U 1116, Groupe Choc, Equipe 2, Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdministration of a selective β1-blocker, such as esmolol, in human septic shock has demonstrated cardiovascular protective effects related to heart rate reduction. Certain experimental data also indicate that esmolol exerts systemic anti-inflammatory and beneficial effects on vascular tone. Thus, the present study aimed to determine whether a non-chronotropic dose of esmolol maintains its protective cardiovascular and anti-inflammatory effects in experimental septic shock.

methodsFour hours after cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), Wistar male rats were randomly allocated to the following groups (n = 8): CLP, CLP + E-1 (esmolol: 1 mg.kg

resultsCLP induced tachycardia, hypotension, cardiac output reduction, hyperlactatemia and vascular hypo-responsiveness to vasopressors. Compared to CLP animals, heart rate was unchanged in CLP + E-1 and CLP + E-5 but was reduced in CLP + E-18. Stroke volume, cardiac output, mean arterial pressure and lactatemia were improved in CLP + E-1 and CLP + E-5, while vascular responsiveness to phenylephrine was only improved in CLP + E-5 and CLP + E-18. Plasma IL-6 levels were decreased in all esmolol groups. p-NF-κB was decreased in both cardiac and vascular tissues in CLP + E-5 and CLP + E-18.

conclusionIn experimental septic shock, low doses of esmolol still improved cardiac function and vasoreactivity. These benefits appear to be associated with a modulation of inflammatory pathways.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsBlood PressureCardiac OutputHeart RateMalePropanolaminesRatsRats, WistarShock, SepticVasomotor SystemAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsesmololPropanolaminesEsmololHeart functionInflammationSepsisVasoreactivity

Identifiers

PMID27998289
PMCPMC5175382
OpenAlexW2562287918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.