Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27998288›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2016

Factors influencing job preferences of health workers providing obstetric care: results from discrete choice experiments in Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania.

Eilish McAuliffe, Marie Galligan, Paul Revill, Francis Kamwendo, Mohsin Sidat, Honorati Masanja, Helen de Pinho, Edson Araujo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Eilish McAuliffeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Eilish.mcauliffe@ucd.ie.
Marie GalliganSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Paul RevillCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Francis KamwendoCentre for Reproductive Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Mohsin SidatDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Honorati MasanjaIfakara Health Institute, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Helen de PinhoAverting Maternal Death and Disability Program (AMDD), Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Edson AraujoHealth, Nutrition and Population Programme, World Bank, Washington DC, USA.
University College Dublin · IEColumbia University · USEduardo Mondlane University · MZIfakara Health Institute · TZUniversity of Malawi · MWUniversity of York · GBWorld Bank · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTask shifting from established health professionals to mid-level providers (MLPs) (professionals who undergo shorter training in specific procedures) is one key strategy for reducing maternal and neonatal deaths. This has resulted in a growth in cadre types providing obstetric care in low and middle-income countries. Little is known about the relative importance of the different factors in determining motivation and retention amongst these cadres.

methodsThis paper presents findings from large sample (1972 respondents) discrete choice experiments to examine the employment preferences of obstetric care workers across three east African countries.

resultsThe strongest predictors of job choice were access to continuing professional development and the presence of functioning human resources management (transparent, accountable and consistent systems for staff support, supervision and appraisal). Consistent with similar works we find pay and allowances significantly positively related to utility, but financial rewards are not as fundamental a factor underlying employment preferences as many may have previously believed. Location (urban vs rural) had the smallest average effect on utility for job choice in all three countries.

conclusionsThese findings are important in the context where efforts to address the human resources crisis have focused primarily on increasing salaries and incentives, as well as providing allowances to work in rural areas.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelChoice BehaviorJob SatisfactionAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMalawiMaleMiddle AgedMotivationMozambiqueObstetricsPregnancySalaries and Fringe BenefitsTanzaniaDiscrete choice experimentsHuman resourcesJob preferencesMalawiMozambiqueNon-physician cliniciansObstetric care providersRetentionTanzania

Identifiers

PMID27998288
PMCPMC5175394
OpenAlexW2561802341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.