Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27998277›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2016

The PULSAR primary care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to test a training intervention for general practitioners in recovery-oriented practice to optimize personal recovery in adult patients.

Joanne C Enticott, Frances Shawyer, Lisa Brophy, Grant Russell, Ellie Fossey, Brett Inder, Danielle Mazza, Shiva Vasi, Penelope June Weller, Elisabeth Wilson-Evered and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Resolving the paradox of increased mental health expenditure and stable prevalence.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanne C EnticottSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, 126 Cleeland St, Dandenong, VIC, Australia.
Frances ShawyerSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, 126 Cleeland St, Dandenong, VIC, Australia.
Lisa BrophyMind Australia, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Grant RussellSchool of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill Campus, Victoria, Australia.
Ellie FosseySchool of Primary Health Care, Monash University Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Brett InderDepartment of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Danielle MazzaSchool of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill Campus, Victoria, Australia.
Shiva VasiSchool of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill Campus, Victoria, Australia.
Penelope June WellerGraduate School of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Elisabeth Wilson-EveredCollege of Business, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Vrinda EdanSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, 126 Cleeland St, Dandenong, VIC, Australia.
Graham MeadowsSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, 126 Cleeland St, Dandenong, VIC, Australia. graham.meadows@monash.edu.
Monash University · AUDandenong Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AURMIT University · AURoyal College of Nursing · GBVictoria University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) in Australia play a central role in the delivery of mental health care. This article describes the PULSAR (Principles Unite Local Services Assisting Recovery) Primary Care protocol, a novel mixed methods evaluation of a training intervention for GPs in recovery-oriented practice. The aim of the intervention is to optimize personal recovery in patients consulting study GPs for mental health issues.

methodsThe intervention mixed methods design involves a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial testing the outcomes of training in recovery-oriented practice, together with an embedded qualitative study to identify the contextual enablers and challenges to implementing recovery-oriented practice. The project is conducted in Victoria, Australia between 2013 and 2017. Eighteen general practices and community health centers are randomly allocated to one of two steps (nine months apart) to start an intervention comprising GP training in the delivery of recovery-oriented practice. Data collection consists of cross-sectional surveys collected from patients of participating GPs at baseline, and again at the end of Steps 1 and 2. The primary outcome is improvement in personal recovery using responses to the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery. Secondary outcomes are improvements in patient-rated measures of personal recovery and wellbeing, and of the recovery-oriented practice they have received, using the INSPIRE questionnaire, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Participant data will be analyzed in the group that the cluster was assigned to at each study time point. Another per-protocol dataset will contain all data time-stamped according to the date of intervention received at each cluster site. Qualitative interviews with GPs and patients at three and nine months post-training will investigate experiences and challenges related to implementing recovery-oriented practice in primary care. DISCUSSION: Recovery-oriented practice is gaining increasing prominence in mental health service delivery and the outcomes of such an approach within the primary care sector for the first time will be evaluated in this project. If findings are positive, the intervention has the potential to extend recovery-oriented practice to GPs throughout the community.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ( ACTRN12614001312639 ). Registered: 8 August 2014.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesVictoriaComplex InterventionGeneral PractitionersMental HealthPrimary CarePsychiatryRandomized Controlled Trial (RCT)RecoveryRecovery-oriented PracticeTraining

Identifiers

PMID27998277
PMCPMC5168875
OpenAlexW2563859421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.