ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Efficient randomization of biological networks while preserving functional characterization of individual nodes.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of dispensable essential genes and their interactions with bypass suppressors.Life science alliance · 2024Pooled it
- SignalingProfiler 2.0 a network-based approach to bridge multi-omics data to phenotypic hallmarks.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Plasmids in the human gut reveal neutral dispersal and recombination that is overpowered by inflammatory diseases.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Curation of causal interactions mediated by genes associated with autism accelerates the understanding of gene-phenotype relationships underlying neurodevelopmental disorders.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Characterizing alternative splicing effects on protein interaction networks with LINDA.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A heuristic algorithm solving the mutual-exclusivity-sorting problem.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Magnetique: an interactive web application to explore transcriptome signatures of heart failure.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Clonal relations in the mouse brain revealed by single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.Nature neuroscience · 2022Article
- Functional network motifs defined through integration of protein-protein and genetic interactions.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Prediction of combination therapies based on topological modeling of the immune signaling network in multiple sclerosis.Genome medicine · 2021Article
- Coupling Machine Learning and Lipidomics as a Tool to Investigate Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease. A General Overview.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- GeneWalk identifies relevant gene functions for a biological context using network representation learning.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Episodic evolution of coadapted sets of amino acid sites in mitochondrial proteins.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Allele-specific nonstationarity in evolution of influenza A virus surface proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Functional linkage of gene fusions to cancer cell fitness assessed by pharmacological and CRISPR-Cas9 screening.Nature communications · 2019Article
- A Network Pharmacology Approach for the Identification of Common Mechanisms of Drug-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2019Article
- Logic Modeling in Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017Article
- Structure of the Transcriptional Regulatory Network Correlates with Regulatory Divergence in Drosophila.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNetworks are popular and powerful tools to describe and model biological processes. Many computational methods have been developed to infer biological networks from literature, high-throughput experiments, and combinations of both. Additionally, a wide range of tools has been developed to map experimental data onto reference biological networks, in order to extract meaningful modules. Many of these methods assess results' significance against null distributions of randomized networks. However, these standard unconstrained randomizations do not preserve the functional characterization of the nodes in the reference networks (i.e. their degrees and connection signs), hence including potential biases in the assessment.
resultsBuilding on our previous work about rewiring bipartite networks, we propose a method for rewiring any type of unweighted networks. In particular we formally demonstrate that the problem of rewiring a signed and directed network preserving its functional connectivity (F-rewiring) reduces to the problem of rewiring two induced bipartite networks. Additionally, we reformulate the lower bound to the iterations' number of the switching-algorithm to make it suitable for the F-rewiring of networks of any size. Finally, we present BiRewire3, an open-source Bioconductor package enabling the F-rewiring of any type of unweighted network. We illustrate its application to a case study about the identification of modules from gene expression data mapped on protein interaction networks, and a second one focused on building logic models from more complex signed-directed reference signaling networks and phosphoproteomic data.
conclusionsBiRewire3 it is freely available at https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/BiRewire/ , and it should have a broad application as it allows an efficient and analytically derived statistical assessment of results from any network biology tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.