Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27998275›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Efficient randomization of biological networks while preserving functional characterization of individual nodes.

Francesco Iorio, Marti Bernardo-Faura, Andrea Gobbi, Thomas Cokelaer, Giuseppe Jurman, Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Allele-specific nonstationarity in evolution of influenza A virus surface proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Logic Modeling in Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco IorioEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK. iorio@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7063-8913
Marti Bernardo-FauraEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Andrea GobbiFondazione Bruno Kessler, Povo, Trento, I-38122, Italy.
Thomas CokelaerEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Giuseppe JurmanFondazione Bruno Kessler, Povo, Trento, I-38122, Italy.
Julio Saez-RodriguezEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK. saezrodriguez@gmail.com.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNetworks are popular and powerful tools to describe and model biological processes. Many computational methods have been developed to infer biological networks from literature, high-throughput experiments, and combinations of both. Additionally, a wide range of tools has been developed to map experimental data onto reference biological networks, in order to extract meaningful modules. Many of these methods assess results' significance against null distributions of randomized networks. However, these standard unconstrained randomizations do not preserve the functional characterization of the nodes in the reference networks (i.e. their degrees and connection signs), hence including potential biases in the assessment.

resultsBuilding on our previous work about rewiring bipartite networks, we propose a method for rewiring any type of unweighted networks. In particular we formally demonstrate that the problem of rewiring a signed and directed network preserving its functional connectivity (F-rewiring) reduces to the problem of rewiring two induced bipartite networks. Additionally, we reformulate the lower bound to the iterations' number of the switching-algorithm to make it suitable for the F-rewiring of networks of any size. Finally, we present BiRewire3, an open-source Bioconductor package enabling the F-rewiring of any type of unweighted network. We illustrate its application to a case study about the identification of modules from gene expression data mapped on protein interaction networks, and a second one focused on building logic models from more complex signed-directed reference signaling networks and phosphoproteomic data.

conclusionsBiRewire3 it is freely available at https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/BiRewire/ , and it should have a broad application as it allows an efficient and analytically derived statistical assessment of results from any network biology tool.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAlgorithmsComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalGene Regulatory NetworksHumansProtein Interaction MapsRandom AllocationSoftwareNetworksPathwaysRewiring

Identifiers

PMID27998275
PMCPMC5168876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.