Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27998267›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

acdc - Automated Contamination Detection and Confidence estimation for single-cell genome data.

Markus Lux, Jan Krüger, Christian Rinke, Irena Maus, Andreas Schlüter, Tanja Woyke, Alexander Sczyrba, Barbara Hammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First Report of IMI-2-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Niche Differentiation among Three Closely RelatedApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Defending Our Public Biological Databases as a Global Critical Infrastructure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  12. Characterization ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Markus LuxComputational Methods for the Analysis of the Diversity and Dynamics of Genomes, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany. mlux@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de.
Jan KrügerCenter for Biotechnology - CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 27, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany.
Christian RinkeAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, ST LUCIA, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Irena MausCenter for Biotechnology - CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 27, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany.
Andreas SchlüterCenter for Biotechnology - CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 27, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany.
Tanja Woyke, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, 94598, CA, USA.
Alexander SczyrbaCenter for Biotechnology - CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 27, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany.
Barbara HammerCITEC centre of excellence, Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1, Bielefeld, 33619, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major obstacle in single-cell sequencing is sample contamination with foreign DNA. To guarantee clean genome assemblies and to prevent the introduction of contamination into public databases, considerable quality control efforts are put into post-sequencing analysis. Contamination screening generally relies on reference-based methods such as database alignment or marker gene search, which limits the set of detectable contaminants to organisms with closely related reference species. As genomic coverage in the tree of life is highly fragmented, there is an urgent need for a reference-free methodology for contaminant identification in sequence data.

resultsWe present acdc, a tool specifically developed to aid the quality control process of genomic sequence data. By combining supervised and unsupervised methods, it reliably detects both known and de novo contaminants. First, 16S rRNA gene prediction and the inclusion of ultrafast exact alignment techniques allow sequence classification using existing knowledge from databases. Second, reference-free inspection is enabled by the use of state-of-the-art machine learning techniques that include fast, non-linear dimensionality reduction of oligonucleotide signatures and subsequent clustering algorithms that automatically estimate the number of clusters. The latter also enables the removal of any contaminant, yielding a clean sample. Furthermore, given the data complexity and the ill-posedness of clustering, acdc employs bootstrapping techniques to provide statistically profound confidence values. Tested on a large number of samples from diverse sequencing projects, our software is able to quickly and accurately identify contamination. Results are displayed in an interactive user interface. Acdc can be run from the web as well as a dedicated command line application, which allows easy integration into large sequencing project analysis workflows.

conclusionsAcdc can reliably detect contamination in single-cell genome data. In addition to database-driven detection, it complements existing tools by its unsupervised techniques, which allow for the detection of de novo contaminants. Our contribution has the potential to drastically reduce the amount of resources put into these processes, particularly in the context of limited availability of reference species. As single-cell genome data continues to grow rapidly, acdc adds to the toolkit of crucial quality assurance tools.

Indexed as

DNA ContaminationGenomeMachine LearningCluster AnalysisDNAQuality ControlSequence Analysis, DNASingle-Cell AnalysisDNABinningClusteringContamination detectionMachine learningQuality controlSingle-cell sequencing

Identifiers

PMID27998267
PMCPMC5168860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.