Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27998243›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2017

Effects of Local Antibiotic Delivery from Porous Space Maintainers on Infection Clearance and Induction of an Osteogenic Membrane in an Infected Bone Defect.

Sarita R Shah, Brandon T Smith, Alexander M Tatara, Eric R Molina, Esther J Lee, Trenton C Piepergerdes, Brent A Uhrig, Robert E Guldberg, George N Bennett, Joseph C Wenke and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone defect treatment: does the type and properties of the spacer affect the induction of Masquelet membrane? Evidence today.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic-Releasing Porous Shell Cements.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. The masquelet technique for severe open fractures: current insights.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Mechanisms of the Masquelet technique to promote bone defect repair and its influencing factors.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025
    Review
  6. Engineering the bone reconstruction surgery: the case of the masquelet-induced membrane technique.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The induced membrane technique in animal models: a systematic review.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarita R Shah1 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
Brandon T Smith1 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
Alexander M Tatara1 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
Eric R Molina1 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
Esther J Lee1 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
Trenton C Piepergerdes1 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
Brent A Uhrig2 Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia .
Robert E Guldberg2 Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia .
George N Bennett3 Department of BioSciences, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
Joseph C Wenke4 Extremity Trauma & Regenerative Medicine, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research , San Antonio, Texas.
Antonios G Mikos1 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
Rice University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Osteogenic and Antimicrobial Drug Delivery for Bone Tissue EngineeringF30AR067606 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, SARITA · 2015 to 2016
$97k
NIAMS NIH HHS F30 AR067606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstruction of large bone defects can be complicated by the presence of both infection and local antibiotic administration. This can be addressed through a two-stage reconstructive approach, called the Masquelet technique, that involves the generation of an induced osteogenic membrane over a temporary poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) space maintainer, followed by definitive reconstruction after the induced membrane is formed. Given that infection and antibiotic delivery each have independent effects on local tissue response, the objective of this study is to evaluate the interaction between local clindamycin release and bacterial contamination with regards to infection prevention and the restoration of pro-osteogenic gene expression in the induced membrane. Porous PMMA space maintainers with or without clindamycin were implanted in an 8 mm rat femoral defect model with or without Staphylococcus aureus inoculation for 28 days in a full-factorial study design (four groups, n = 8/group). Culture results demonstrated that 8/8 animals in the inoculated/no antibiotic group were infected at 4 weeks, which was significantly reduced to 1/8 animals in the inoculated/antibiotic group. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated that clindamycin treatment restores inflammatory cytokine and growth factor expression to the same levels as the no inoculation/no antibiotic group, demonstrating that clindamycin can ameliorate the negative effects of bacterial inoculation and does not itself negatively impact the expression of important cytokines. Main effect analysis shows that bacterial inoculation and clindamycin treatment have independent and interacting effects on the gene expression profile of the induced membrane, further highlighting that antibiotics play an important role in the regeneration of infected defects apart from their antimicrobial properties.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinDrug Delivery SystemsFemoral FracturesPolymethyl MethacrylateAnimalsFemurRatsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusWound InfectionAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinPolymethyl Methacrylateantibioticsclindamycininduced membraneinfectionPMMA

Identifiers

PMID27998243
PMCPMC5312600
OpenAlexW2575492557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.