Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27997983›Full record

ArticleAllergy2017

Validation of International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision codes for atopic dermatitis.

D Y Hsu, P Dalal, K A Sable, N Voruganti, B Nardone, D P West, J I Silverberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D Y HsuDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
P DalalDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
K A SableDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
N VorugantiDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
B NardoneDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
D P WestDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
J I SilverbergDepartments of Dermatology, Preventive Medicine and Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3686-7805

Funding

Multidisciplinary Clinical and Translational Science (MCTS) Program (UL1)UL1TR000150 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LLOYD-JONES, DONALD M · 2012 to 2013
$10.1M
Northwestern University Patient-centered Intervention and Engagement TrainingK12HS023011 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS023011NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of large-scale data sets is needed to better understand the epidemiology, cost, and burden of atopic dermatitis (AD). We sought to validate the use of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying AD.

methodsPatients from a large metropolitan quaternary care medical center with a diagnostic code of either 691.8 (AD) or 692.9 (eczema and contact dermatitis) were queried. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, Hanifin & Rajka (H&R) and United Kingdom Working Party (UKWP) criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPV) of the codes were calculated.

resultsOf 43 278 patients identified with associated ICD-9 codes of 691.8 or 692.9, 519 and 253 with 691.8 and 692.9 were randomly selected for chart review. There was extensive overlap: 34.3% had ≥1 occurrences of 691.8 and 692.9 and 25.6% had multiple occurrences of both codes. Among patients with ≥1 occurrence of 691.8, 29.9% and 30.8% met the H&R and UKWP criteria, respectively. Similarly, among patients with ≥1 occurrence of 692.9, 33.7% and 32.2% met the H&R and UKWP criteria. Increased PPV was associated with concomitant diagnoses of asthma, hay fever, and food allergy and increased disease severity.

conclusionsIn the outpatient setting, the ICD-9-CM codes 691.8 and 692.9 alone have poor PPV. Incorporation of diagnoses of asthma, hay fever, and food allergy improves PPV and specificity. In the inpatient setting, a primary discharge diagnosis of 691.8 had excellent PPV. Although ICD-10 has been adopted in Europe and more recently in the USA, the same systematic errors would likely occur unless providers standardize their coding.

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesDermatitis, AtopicFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness Indexatopic dermatitiscodingeczema

Identifiers

PMID27997983
PMCPMC5461190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.