Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27997597›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of the DAR-901 Booster Vaccine in a Murine Model of Tuberculosis.

Timothy Lahey, Dominick Laddy, Krystal Hill, Jacqueline Schaeffer, Alison Hogg, James Keeble, Belinda Dagg, Mei Mei Ho, Robert D Arbeit, C Fordham von Reyn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. HowVaccines · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Immunity AgainstVaccines · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The role of antibodies in tuberculosis diagnosis, prophylaxis and therapy: a review from the ESGMYC study group.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. An Update on Tuberculosis Vaccines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy LaheyDartmouth's Geisel School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, United States of America.
Dominick LaddyAeras, 1405 Research Blvd. Rockville, MD United States of America.
Krystal HillAeras, 1405 Research Blvd. Rockville, MD United States of America.
Jacqueline SchaefferAeras, 1405 Research Blvd. Rockville, MD United States of America.
Alison HoggAeras, 1405 Research Blvd. Rockville, MD United States of America.
James KeebleBacteriology Division, MHRA-NIBSC, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Belinda DaggBacteriology Division, MHRA-NIBSC, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Mei Mei HoBacteriology Division, MHRA-NIBSC, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Robert D ArbeitTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA United States of America.
C Fordham von ReynDartmouth's Geisel School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, United States of America.
Aeras · USNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBDartmouth College · USTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of a novel tuberculosis vaccine is a leading global health priority. SRL172, an inactivated, whole-cell mycobacterial vaccine, was safe, immunogenic and reduced the incidence of culture-confirmed tuberculosis in a phase III trial in HIV-infected and BCG immunized adults in Tanzania. Here we describe the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of DAR-901, a booster vaccine against tuberculosis manufactured from the same seed strain using a new scalable method.

methodsWe evaluated IFN-γ responses by ELISpot and antibody responses by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice after three doses of DAR-901. In an aerosol challenge model, we evaluated the protective efficacy of the DAR-901 booster in C57BL/6 mice primed with BCG and boosted with two doses of DAR-901 at 4 dosage levels in comparison with homologous BCG boost.

resultsDAR-901 vaccination elicited IFN-γ responses to mycobacterial antigen preparations derived from both DAR-901 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. DAR-901 immunization enhanced antibody responses to DAR-901 but not Mycobacterium tuberculosis lysate or purified protein derivative. Among animals primed with BCG, boosting with DAR-901 at 1 mg provided greater protection against aerosol challenge than a homologous BCG boost (lungs P = 0.036, spleen P = 0.028).

conclusionsDAR-901 induces cellular and humoral immunity and boosts protection from M. tuberculosis compared to a homologous BCG boost.

Indexed as

Immunization, SecondaryImmunogenicity, VaccineAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBCG VaccineDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisAntigens, BacterialBCG Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID27997597
PMCPMC5173179
OpenAlexW2563567978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.