Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27997028›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2017

Differential Sensitivity to Ethanol-Induced Circadian Rhythm Disruption in Adolescent and Adult Mice.

Christina L Ruby, Kaitlyn N Palmer, Jiawen Zhang, Megan O Risinger, Melissa A Butkowski, H Scott Swartzwelder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Relationship of Circadian Rhythm in Behavioral Characteristics and Lipid Peroxidation of Brain Tissues in Mice.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina L RubyDepartment of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4218-7286
Kaitlyn N PalmerDepartment of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania.
Jiawen ZhangDepartment of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania.
Megan O RisingerDepartment of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania.
Melissa A ButkowskiDepartment of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania.
H Scott SwartzwelderDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Indiana University of Pennsylvania · USDuke University · US

Funding

Supp: Effects of Adolescent Alcohol Exposure on Hippocampal Function in AdulthoodU01AA019925 · NIAAA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SWARTZWELDER, H SCOTT · 2010 to 2024
$5.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA019925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing evidence supports a central role for the circadian system in alcohol use disorders, but few studies have examined this relationship during adolescence. In mammals, circadian rhythms are regulated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus, a biological clock whose timing is synchronized (reset) to the environment primarily by light (photic) input. Alcohol (ethanol [EtOH]) disrupts circadian timing in part by attenuating photic phase-resetting responses in adult rodents. However, circadian rhythms change throughout life and it is not yet known whether EtOH has similar effects on circadian regulation during adolescence.

methodsGeneral circadian locomotor activity was monitored in male C57BL6/J mice beginning in adolescence (P27) or adulthood (P61) in a 12-hour light, 12-hour dark photocycle for ~2 weeks to establish baseline circadian activity measures. On the day of the experiment, mice received an acute injection of EtOH (1.5 g/kg, i.p.) or equal volume saline 15 minutes prior to a 30-minute light pulse at Zeitgeber Time 14 (2 hours into the dark phase) and then were released into constant darkness (DD) for ~2 weeks to assess phase-resetting responses. Control mice of each age-group received injections but no light pulse prior to DD.

resultsWhile adults showed the expected decrease in photic phase-delays induced by acute EtOH, this effect was absent in adolescent mice. Adolescents also showed baseline differences in circadian rhythmicity compared to adults, including advanced photocycle entrainment, larger photic phase-delays, a shorter free-running (endogenous) circadian period, and greater circadian rhythm amplitude.

conclusionsCollectively, our results indicate that adolescent mice are less sensitive to the effect of EtOH on circadian photic phase-resetting and that their daily activity rhythms are markedly different than those of adults.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsCircadian RhythmEthanolMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivityPhotic StimulationEthanolAdolescentAlcoholCircadianPhotic Phase-Resetting

Identifiers

PMID27997028
PMCPMC5205578
OpenAlexW2565263180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.