Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27996018›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Survival strategies of citrus rootstocks subjected to drought.

Dayse Drielly Souza Santana-Vieira, Luciano Freschi, Lucas Aragão da Hora Almeida, Diogo Henrique Santos de Moraes, Diana Matos Neves, Liziane Marques Dos Santos, Fabiana Zanelato Bertolde, Walter Dos Santos Soares Filho, Maurício Antonio Coelho Filho, Abelmon da Silva Gesteira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dayse Drielly Souza Santana-VieiraDepartamento de Biologia, Centro de Genética and Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia 45662-900, Brazil.
Luciano FreschiDepartamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.
Lucas Aragão da Hora AlmeidaDepartamento de Biologia, Centro de Genética and Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia 45662-900, Brazil.
Diogo Henrique Santos de MoraesDepartamento de Biologia, Centro de Genética and Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia 45662-900, Brazil.
Diana Matos NevesDepartamento de Biologia, Centro de Genética and Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia 45662-900, Brazil.
Liziane Marques Dos SantosDepartamento de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Cruz das Almas, Bahia 44380-000, Brazil.
Fabiana Zanelato BertoldeDepartamento de Ensino, Instituto Federal da Bahia, Campus Eunápolis, Eunápolis, Bahia 45823-431, Brazil.
Walter Dos Santos Soares FilhoEmbrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, 44380-000, Brazil.
Maurício Antonio Coelho FilhoEmbrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, 44380-000, Brazil.
Abelmon da Silva GesteiraDepartamento de Biologia, Centro de Genética and Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia 45662-900, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRInstituto de Botânica · BRInstituto Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two citrus rootstocks, Rangpur lime (RL) and Sunki Maravilha mandarin (SM), were analyzed either ungrafted or grafted with their reciprocal graft combinations or with shoot scions of two commercial citrus varieties: Valencia orange (VO) and Tahiti acid lime (TAL). All graft combinations were subjected to distinct watering regimes: well-watered, severe drought and rehydration. Growth and water relation parameters, gas exchange as well as sugar and hormone profiles were determined. Data indicated that RL adopted a dehydration avoidance strategy and maintained growth, whereas SM adopted a dehydration tolerance strategy focused on plant survival. Compared with RL, the leaves and roots of SM exhibited higher concentrations of abscisic acid and salicylic acid, which induced drought tolerance, and accumulation of carbohydrates such as trehalose and raffinose, which are important reactive oxygen species scavengers. SM rootstocks were able to transfer their survival strategy to the grafted shoot scions (RL, VO, TAL). Because of their contrasting survival strategies, RL reached the permanent wilting point more quickly than SM whereas SM recovered from prolonged droughts more efficiently than RL. This is one of the most complete studies of drought tolerance mechanisms in citrus crops and is the first to use reciprocal grafting to clarify scion/rootstock interactions.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalCitrusDehydrationPlant RootsPlant Shoots

Identifiers

PMID27996018
PMCPMC5171762
OpenAlexW2563429325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.