Trial reportSpinal cord2017
Telephone-based management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low- and middle-income countries: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Spinal cord, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04944186 (The Effect of Structured Pressure Injury Patient Education Program on Knowledge, Participation, Wound Healing Progress and Quality of Life Among Patient With Limited Mobility), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Structured Pressure Injury Patient Education Program on Knowledge, Participation, Wound Healing Progress and Quality of Life Among Patient With Limited Mobility
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multidimensional Effects of Telemedicine on Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of surgical interventions in patients with severe pressure ulcers: the SIPS mixed-methods exploratory study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Telemedicine on Wound-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Wounds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of telemedicine interventions on quality of life and depression in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- [Telephone assistance for neurological diseases: a systematic review].Revista de neurologia · 2023Pooled it
- Telemedicine for Preventing and Treating Pressure Injury After Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Telerehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injury in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature.Spinal cord · 2022Pooled it
- Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of telephone-based support for the management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in India and Bangladesh.Spinal cord · 2017Trial
- Randomised controlled trials of nursing interventions in spinal cord injury: a scoping review.Spinal cord series and cases · 2026Article
- Article
- Rising to the challenge: Value based research for Orthopaedic ailments.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- Article
- Factors Influencing Participation in Daily Activities by Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: Lessons Learned From an International Scoping Review.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Current Status and Future Directions of mHealth Interventions for Health System Strengthening in India: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Review
- Telehealth for people with spinal cord injury: a narrative review.Spinal cord · 2018Review
- Myelotomy promotes locomotor recovery in rats subjected to spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.Neural regeneration research · 2018Article
- Interventions for pressure ulcers: a summary of evidence for prevention and treatment.Spinal cord · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designA multicentre, prospective, assessor-blinded, parallel randomised controlled trial.
objectivesThe objective of the trial was to determine the effectiveness of telephone-based management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in low- and middle-income countries.
methodsOne hundred and twenty people with SCI living in the community were recruited through three hospitals in India and Bangladesh between November 2013 and March 2016. Participants had sustained an SCI >3 months prior and had a pressure ulcer. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to a control or intervention group. Participants in the control group received no intervention. Participants in the intervention group received weekly advice by telephone for 12 weeks about the management of their pressure ulcers from a trained health-care professional. Outcomes were measured by a blinded assessor at baseline and 12 weeks. There was one primary outcome, namely, the size of the pressure ulcer and 13 secondary outcomes.
resultsThe mean between-group difference for the size of the pressure ulcer at 12 weeks was 2.3 cm
conclusionThe results of our primary outcome (that is, size of pressure ulcer) do not provide conclusive evidence that people with SCI can be supported at home to manage their pressure ulcers through regular telephone-based advice. However, the results from the secondary outcomes are sufficiently positive to provide hope that this simple intervention may provide some relief from this insidious problem in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27995939What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.