Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995750›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2017

Keloid progression: a stiffness gap hypothesis.

Chenyu Huang, Longwei Liu, Zhifeng You, Bingjie Wang, Yanan Du, Rei Ogawa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Keloid Disorder: Heterogeneity, Histopathology, Mechanisms and Models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A Different Keloid in More Ways than One.Indian dermatology online journal
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chenyu HuangDepartment of Dermatology Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Longwei LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhifeng YouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Bingjie WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yanan DuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Rei OgawaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsinghua University · CNBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · CNNippon Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keloids are fibroproliferative skin disorders characterised clinically by continuous horizontal progression and post-surgical recurrence and histologically by the accumulation of collagen and fibroblast ingredients. Till now, their aetiology remains clear, which may cover genetic, environmental and metabolic factors. Evidence in the involvement of local mechanics (e.g. predilection site and typical shape) and the progress in mechanobiology have incubated our stiffness gap hypotheses in illustrating the chronic but constant development in keloid. We put forward that the enlarged gap between extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness and cellular stiffness potentiates keloid progression. Matrix stiffness itself provides organisational guidance cues to regulate the mechanosensitive resident cells (e.g. proliferation, migration and apoptosis). During this dynamic process, the ECM stiffness and cell stiffness are not well balanced, and the continuously enlarged stiffness gap between them potentiates keloid progression. The cushion factors, such as prestress for cell stiffness and topology for ECM stiffness, serve as compensations, the decompensation of which aggravates keloid development. It can well explain the typical shape of keloids, their progression in a horizontal but not vertical direction and the post-surgical recurrence, which were evidenced by our clinical cases. Such a stiffness gap hypothesis might be bridged to mechanotherapeutic approaches for keloid progression.

Indexed as

ElasticityHumansKeloidSkin DiseasesWound HealingWounds and InjuriesExtracellular cell matrix stiffnessKeloidMechanobiologyMechanoresponsivenessScar pathology

Identifiers

PMID27995750
PMCPMC7950128
OpenAlexW2563696236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.