Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995503›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2017

Improvement of anti-nutritional effect resulting from β-glucanase specific expression in the parotid gland of transgenic pigs.

Li-Zeng Guan, Jin-Shun Cai, Shuai Zhao, Yu-Ping Sun, Jing-Lan Wang, Yong Jiang, Gang Shu, Qing-Yan Jiang, Zhen-Fang Wu, Qian-Yun Xi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Gene Editing for Enhanced Swine Production: Current Advances and Prospects.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Improvements in pig agriculture through gene editing.CABI agriculture and bioscience · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Zeng GuanNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Jin-Shun CaiAgriculture College, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China.
Shuai ZhaoNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Yu-Ping SunNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Jing-Lan WangNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Yong JiangNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Gang ShuNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Qing-Yan JiangNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Zhen-Fang WuNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Qian-Yun XiNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China. xqy0228@scau.edu.cn.
Yong-Liang ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, SCAU-Alltech Research Joint Alliance, South China Agricultural University, 483 Wushan Road, Guangzhou, 510642, China. zhangyl@scau.edu.cn.
South China Agricultural University · CNYanbian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

β-Glucan is the predominant anti-nutritional factors in monogastric animal feed. Although β-glucanase supplementation in diet can help to eliminate the adverse effects, enzyme stability is substantially modified during the feed manufacturing process. To determine whether the expression of endogenous β-glucanase gene (GLU) in vivo can improve digestibility of dietary β-glucan and absorption of nutrients, we successfully produced transgenic pigs via nuclear transfer which express the GLU from Paenibacillus polymyxa CP7 in the parotid gland. In three live transgenic founders, β-glucanase activities in the saliva were 3.2, 0.07 and 0.03 U/mL, respectively, and interestingly the enzyme activities increased in the pigs from 178 days old to 789 days old. From the feed the amount of gross energy, crude protein and crude fat absorbed by the transgenic pigs was significantly higher than the non-transgenic pigs. Meanwhile the moisture content of the feces was significantly reduced in transgenic pigs compared with the non-transgenic pigs. Furthermore, in all positive G1 pigs, β-glucanase activity was detectable and the highest enzyme activity reached 3.5 U/mL in saliva. Also, crude protein digestion was significantly higher in G1 transgenic pigs than in control pigs. Taken together, our data showed that the transgenic β-glucanase exerted its biological catalytic function in vivo in the saliva, and the improved performance of the transgenic pigs could be accurately passed on to the offspring, indicating a promising alternative approach to improving nutrient availability was established to improve utilization of livestock feed through transgenic animals.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimal FeedAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedFecesGlycoside HydrolasesPaenibacillus polymyxaParotid GlandSwineGlycoside Hydrolases1,3-1,4-β-GlucanaseParotid glandTransgenic pigs

Identifiers

PMID27995503
OpenAlexW2561938492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.