Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995440›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2017

The hologenome concept: we need to incorporate function.

Francesco Catania, Ulrich Krohs, Marco Chittò, Diana Ferro, Kevin Ferro, Gildas Lepennetier, Hans-Dieter Görtz, Rebecca S Schreiber, Joachim Kurtz, Jürgen Gadau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Do ecosystems have functions?Ecology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  4. SARS-CoV-2, Trait Anxiety, and the Microbiome.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesco CataniaInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. francesco.catania@uni-muenster.de.
Ulrich KrohsMünster Graduate School of Evolution, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1a, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Marco ChittòMünster Graduate School of Evolution, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1a, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Diana FerroInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Kevin FerroInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Gildas LepennetierInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Hans-Dieter GörtzMünster Graduate School of Evolution, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1a, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Rebecca S SchreiberMünster Graduate School of Evolution, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1a, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Joachim KurtzInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Jürgen GadauInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. Juergen.Gadau@asu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Are we in the midst of a paradigm change in biology and have animals and plants lost their individuality, i.e., are even so-called 'typical' organisms no longer organisms in their own right? Is the study of the holobiont-host plus its symbiotic microorganisms-no longer optional, but rather an obligatory path that must be taken for a comprehensive understanding of the ecology and evolution of the individual components that make up a holobiont? Or are associated microbes merely a component of their host's environment, and the holobiont concept is just a beautiful idea that does not add much or anything to our understanding of evolution? This article explores different aspects of the concept of the holobiont. We focus on the aspect of functional integration, a central holobiont property, which is only rarely considered thoroughly. We conclude that the holobiont comes in degrees, i.e., we regard the property of being a holobiont as a continuous trait that we term holobiontness, and that holobiontness is differentiated in several dimensions. Although the holobiont represents yet another level of selection (different from classical individual or group selection because it acts on a system that is composed of multiple species), it depends on the grade of functional integration whether or not the holobiont concept helps to cast light on the various degrees of interactions between symbiotic partners.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBiological EvolutionAnimalsAnthozoaBiologyDrosophilaEcologyFungiHumansParameciumPhenotypePlantsRickettsiaSymbiosisEvolutionFunctionFunctional integrationHolobiontHologenomeSymbiosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.