Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995385›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2017

Effect of shorter pulse duration in cochlear neural activation with an 810-nm near-infrared laser.

Jingxuan Wang, Lan Tian, Jianren Lu, Ming Xia, Ying Wei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jingxuan WangResearch Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621900, China.
Lan TianSchool of Microelectronics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China. sdutld@yeah.net.
Jianren LuSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China.
Ming XiaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China.
Ying WeiSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China.
Shandong University · CNChina Academy of Engineering Physics · CNSecond Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical neural stimulation in the cochlea has been presented as an alternative technique to the electrical stimulation due to its potential in spatially selectivity enhancement. So far, few studies have selected the near-infrared (NIR) laser in cochlear neural stimulation and limited optical parameter space has been examined. This paper focused on investigating the optical parameter effect on NIR stimulation of auditory neurons, especially under shorter pulse durations. The spiral ganglion neurons in the cochlea of deafened guinea pigs were stimulated with a pulsed 810-nm NIR laser in vivo. The laser radiation was delivered by an optical fiber and irradiated towards the modiolus. Optically evoked auditory brainstem responses (OABRs) with various optical parameters were recorded and investigated. The OABRs could be elicited with the cochlear deafened animals by using the 810-nm laser in a wide pulse duration ranged from 20 to 1000 μs. Results showed that the OABR intensity increased along with the increasing laser radiant exposure of limited range at each specific pulse duration. In addition, for the pulse durations from 20 to 300 μs, the OABR intensity increased monotonically along with the pulse duration broadening. While for pulse durations above 300 μs, the OABR intensity basically kept stable with the increasing pulse duration. The 810-nm NIR laser could be an effective stimulus in evoking the cochlear neuron response. Our experimental data provided evidence to optimize the pulse duration range, and the results suggested that the pulse durations from 20 to 300 μs could be the optimized range in cochlear neural activation with the 810-nm-wavelength laser.

Indexed as

Infrared RaysLasersAnimalsCochleaCochlear NerveEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleGuinea PigsMaleOptical FibersTime FactorsAuditory neuronCochleaNear-infrared (NIR)Optically evoked auditory brainstem response (OABR)Optical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27995385
OpenAlexW2565230789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.