Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995360›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2017

A European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) survey of European critical care management of young people.

R Tuckwell, D Wood, S Mansfield-Sturgess, J Brierley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R TuckwellUniversity College London Medical School, London, UK.
D WoodPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond St Hospital for Children NHS Trust & Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
S Mansfield-SturgessPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond St Hospital for Children NHS Trust & Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
J BrierleyPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond St Hospital for Children NHS Trust & Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK. joe.brierley@gosh.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents have specific healthcare needs distinct from adults or younger children secondary to anatomical, physiological and socio-behavioural differences. Healthcare providers have been slow to address this, leading the UK Department of Health (2011) to publish 'You're Welcome' quality criteria for services for young people. (In the UK, the term young people is preferred to adolescent.) These generic criteria poorly fit the critical care environment, omitting key issues whilst insisting upon irrelevant standards. But as young people are infrequent patients for any individual unit, the research base to guide optimal management is poor and we could find no international or national guidance. Together with the hospital's young people's group, our intensive care team identified six areas important for critically ill young people, which are the 6Ps: privacy, permission, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, personal life, puberty and practical issues. We then surveyed practice across Europe regarding these themes. Fifty-four hospitals from 16 countries participated, demonstrating disparate practice and widely differing policies to meet the requirements of critically ill young people.

conclusionThere is little consistency of practice in some areas such as pregnancy testing, DVT prophylaxis or partner visiting, whereas in others, such as involving young people in healthcare decisions where possible, practice is consistently good. Further research should focus on the young people's experience of critical care to refine healthcare policy. What is Known: • Adolescents have distinct health and psychosocial needs that are often poorly catered for in contemporary healthcare settings, including critical care. • As adolescents are infrequent patients for any intensive care unit, there is a poor research base and essentially no guidance, regarding optimal care. What is New: • We developed a mnemonic with adolescents and ICU staff to improve healthcare delivery to young people in critical care, the 6Ps: privacy, permission, DVT prophylaxis, personal life, puberty and practical issues. • Delivery of the adolescents' critical care varies greatly both between and within countries; the 6Ps offers a method of standardising and improving this across different countries.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesContraceptives, OralCritical CareDelivery of Health CareEuropeHumansHygieneInformed Consent By MinorsIntensive Care UnitsPregnancy TestsPrivacyProfessional Practice GapsQuality of Health CareVenous ThrombosisContraceptives, OralAdolescentEpidemiologyIntensive careSurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.