ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2017
[Colovesical fistulas : An interdisciplinary challenge].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of treatment of patients with colovesical fistulas should be prompt elimination of the infection and the social burden. We focused on the question whether a minimally invasive surgical approach as a cooperation between surgeons and urologists is possible. This requires effective diagnostics prior to the operation.
methodsSince 2007 a total of 32 patients with the clinical suspicion of colovesical fistula have undergone extensive preoperative diagnostics. Operative treatment aimed primarily for a minimally invasive approach. In particular, the validity of preoperative diagnostics was analyzed and surgical results were characterized by clinical success, complications and long-term effects.
resultsThe medical history significant for colovesical fistula and detected urinary infection provided the best evidence for the specific diagnosis. Cystoscopy, computed tomography (CT) scan and colonoscopy were only partially effective for predicting a fistula as subsequently diagnosed by histopathological investigations. Fistulas due to diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon occurred in 28 cases, while in 3 subjects there was a gynecological and inflammatory cause (malignant tumor growth, n = 1). A laparoscopic approach achieving repair and healing of the fistula was possible in 29 cases including conversion in 3 subjects because of intraoperative complications. The remaining patients underwent conventional treatment. The disease-related complication rate as revealed during follow-up was 10%. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic repair and healing of a colovesical fistula is possible in the majority of cases by the recommended preoperative ureteral stenting. As part of diagnostic measures, the medical history significant for a fistula and detection of urinary infections are the most reliable aspects. In the case of this combination together with a further diagnostic measure, a laparoscopic approach is always recommended. The recurrency rate is 0%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27995299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.