Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995217›Full record

ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2016

Robotic assisted adrenalectomy: Is it ready for prime time?

Xin Ling Teo, Sey Kiat Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Giant symptomatic adrenal myelolipoma: A case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  7. Laparoscopic Versus Open Adrenalectomy: a Retrospective Comparative Study.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Robotic adrenalectomy.Gland surgery · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Robotic surgery an evolution of future direction.Investigative and clinical urology · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin Ling TeoDepartment of Urology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Sey Kiat LimDepartment of Urology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adrenal surgery is undergoing continuous evolution and minimally invasive surgery is increasingly being used for the surgical management of adrenal masses. With robotic-assisted surgery being a widely accepted surgical treatment for many urological conditions such as prostate carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma, the use of the robot has been expanded to include robotic-assisted adrenalectomy, offering an alternative minimally invasive platform for adrenal surgery. We performed a literature review on robotic-assisted adrenalectomy, reviewing the current surgical techniques and perioperative outcomes.

Indexed as

AdrenalectomyRobotics

Identifiers

PMID27995217
PMCPMC5161013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.