Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995015›Full record

ReviewSpringerPlus2016

The prognostic factors for patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit.

Qian Cheng, Yishu Tang, Qing Yang, Erhua Wang, Jing Liu, Xin Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Haematology nurses' perspectives of their patients' places of care and death: A UK qualitative interview study.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qian Cheng *Department of Hematology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013 Hunan China.
Yishu Tang *Department of Hematology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013 Hunan China.
Qing YangDepartment of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT USA.
Erhua WangDepartment of Hematology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013 Hunan China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Hematology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013 Hunan China.
Xin LiDepartment of Hematology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013 Hunan China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the nature of acute illness and adverse effects derived from intensive chemotherapy, patients with hematological malignancies (HM) who are admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) often present with poor prognosis. However, with advances in life-sustaining therapies and close collaborations between hematologists and intensive care specialists, the prognosis for these patients has improved substantially. Many studies from different countries have examined the prognostic factors of these critically ill HM patients. However, there has not been an up-to-date review on this subject, and very few studies have focused on the prognosis of patients with HM admitted to the ICU in Asian countries. Herein, we aim to explore the current situation and prognostic factors in patients with HM admitted to ICU, mainly focusing on studies published in the last 10 years.

Indexed as

Asian countriesHematological malignanciesIntensive carePrognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID27995015
PMCPMC5127914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.