Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27995001›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

Evaluation of the patients with colorectal cancer undergoing emergent curative surgery.

Fikri Kundes, Metin Kement, Kenan Cetin, Levent Kaptanoglu, Aytaç Kocaoglu, Mehmet Karahan, Serkan Fatih Yegen, Ali Emre Atici, Osman Civil, Mehmet Eser and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Following Emergency Department Admission: Understanding Poor Outcomes and Disparities in Care.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fikri KundesDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Metin KementDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kenan CetinDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Levent KaptanogluDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aytaç KocaogluDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet KarahanDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serkan Fatih YegenDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Emre AticiDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Osman CivilDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet EserDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tebessum CakirDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nejdet BildikDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of our study is to evaluate perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes of the patients with colorectal cancer, who underwent emergent curative surgery.

methodsThe study included all patients with colorectal cancer, who underwent surgery for curative intent between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2014 in General Surgery Department of Kartal Training and Research Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of admission (emergent or elective). The data of the patients were retrospectively collected with chart review. Demographic characteristics of the patients, ASA scores, emergent indications and surgical interventions, postoperative complications, pathological findings, oncological therapy, and follow-up findings were investigated.

resultsFifty-one and 209 patients were evaluated in both groups, respectively. Rate of right sided and sigmoid/recto-sigmoid tumors were significantly higher in emergent group. Ostomy rate, early morbidity, ICU need, transfusion, and mortality rates in emergent group were significantly higher than elective group. Average length of hospital stay in emergent group was also significantly longer in elective group (11.2 ± 3.2 vs. 8.4 ± 2.4 days). The patients in emergent group had a much lower survival rate than those in elective group.

conclusionIn our study, emergency presentation of colorectal cancer was found associated with increased morbidity, a longer length of stay, increased in-hospital mortality, advanced pathologic stage and worsened long term survival in even same stages.

Indexed as

Colon cancersColorectal cancersEmergency surgeryRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID27995001
PMCPMC5125280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.