ReviewCartilage2017
New Technology in Imaging Cartilage of the Ankle.
Review in Cartilage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrashort echo time bi-component analysis of tibiotalar articular cartilage after long-distance running.European radiology · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance T2* mapping sequence for imaging of talar cartilage injury under traction with the small field of view coil.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Overview of Ankle Arthropathy in Hereditary Hemochromatosis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Ankle osteoarthritis: comprehensive review and treatment algorithm proposal.EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
- Correlation of Postoperative Imaging With MRI and Clinical Outcome After Cartilage Repair of the Ankle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: an up-to-date approach to multimodality imaging and surgical techniques.Skeletal radiology · 2021Review
- Article
- [Update cartilage imaging of the small joints : Focus on high-field MRI].Der Radiologe · 2019Review
- [Advanced cartilage imaging for detection of cartilage injuries and osteochondral lesions].Der Radiologe · 2018Review
- [When is cartilage repair successful?]Der Radiologe · 2017Review
- Article
- Updates in Musculoskeletal Imaging.Sports healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of osteochondral lesions, as well as osteoarthritis of the ankle joint following osteochondritis dissecans and trauma, has been reappraised in recent years. Consequently, an increasing number of surgical interventions using different cartilage repair techniques is performed in the ankle joint, which has resulted in a growing demand for repetitive and objective assessment of cartilage tissue and its repair. While morphological imaging does enable monitoring of macroscopic changes with increasing precision, it fails to provide information about the ultrastructural composition of cartilage. The significance of molecular changes in cartilage matrix composition, however, is increasingly recognized, as it is assumed that macroscopic cartilage degeneration is preceded by a loss in glycosaminoglycans and a disorganization of the collagen network. Recent advances in biochemical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have yielded sequences sensitive to these changes, thus providing invaluable insight into both early cartilage degeneration and maturation of repair tissue, on a molecular level. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of these techniques, including water and collagen-sensitive T2/T2* mapping, as well as glycosaminoglycan-sensitive sequences such as delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage dGEMRIC, and sodium imaging, and describe their applications for the ankle joint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.