Endurance Performance during Severe-Intensity Intermittent Cycling: Effect of Exercise Duration and Recovery Type.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Analysis of Movement Variability in Cycling: An Exploratory Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Article
2. Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
   Article
3. Measures of excessPilot and feasibility studies · 2021
   Article
4. The acute physiological and perceptual effects of recovery interval intensity during cycling-based high-intensity interval training.European journal of applied physiology · 2021
   Article
5. Role of Respiratory Buffering in the Relationship Between Recovery and Performance Fatigability Following Aerobic Exercise Training: A Longitudinal, Observational, Pilot Study.Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as