Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27994329›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2016

Bypass Operation for Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: Postoperative Complications After Thoracotomy Versus No Thoracotomy.

Masahiro Kimura

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masahiro KimuraDepartment of Surgery, Nagoya City East Medical Center, 2-23 Wakamizu 1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8547 Japan.
Nagoya City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with unresectable esophageal cancer suffer from dysphagia, causing severe malnutrition and reduced quality of life (QOL). We elect to perform bypass because patients can have greater long-term survival with chemoradiation following this operation. We sought to compare complications in cases of bypass without thoracotomy versus those with thoracotomy. Thirty-four locally advanced esophageal cancer patients between 2007 and 2014 were studied. Eighteen patients underwent thoracotomy, and 16 patients did not have a thoracotomy. CT was obtained to check the anastomosis and the oral stump of the esophagus and to measure the diameter of the intrathoracic esophagus. In the thoracotomy group, the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications was high. On the other hand, in the non-thoracotomy group, the rates of anastomotic leak and recurrent nerve paralysis were high. The stump of the esophagus was 2 cm lower in the T group than in the nT group. As the esophagus shortens after division, the final difference in esophageal height between the groups was only around 1 cm. We concluded that a viable gastric tube with a good blood supply as well as a careful cervical operation are the most important aspects of the esophageal bypass operation.

Indexed as

Anastomotic leakBypass operationEsophageal cancerThoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID27994329
PMCPMC5127981
OpenAlexW2316843719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.