Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27994187›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetics2016

Cytogenetic analysis in couples with recurrent miscarriages: a retrospective study from Punjab, north India.

Neha Sudhir, Tajinder Kaur, Archana Beri, Anupam Kaur

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neha SudhirDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar 143 005, India. anupamkaur@yahoo.com.
Tajinder Kaur
Archana Beri
Anupam Kaur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human reproduction is considered as the most inefficient event as ~15-20% of human pregnancies end in miscarriage and in the product of miscarriages, chromosomal anomalies are a common occurrence. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in couples with recurrent miscarriages in the region of Punjab and to compare with worldwide frequencies. In this study, a total of 440 cases were referred between the period 1995-2015. After lymphocyte culturing, giemsa-trypsin banding was done for each case to assess the chromosomal anomalies. The frequency of chromosomal aberrations among couples was found to be 3.41% in our study. Among these aberrations, balanced reciprocal translocations formed the largest group with 60% anomalies. We would conclude that clinicians should understand the importance of chromosomal analysis in these couples and refer them for karyotyping after two miscarriages to rule out the possible genetic cause of recurrent miscarriages.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsCytogenetic AnalysisAbortion, HabitualAdultChromosome BandingFemaleHumansIndiaKaryotypeKaryotypingMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePregnancyRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27994187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.