Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27994152›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Disrupting the blood-brain barrier by focused ultrasound induces sterile inflammation.

Zsofia I Kovacs, Saejeong Kim, Neekita Jikaria, Farhan Qureshi, Blerta Milo, Bobbi K Lewis, Michele Bresler, Scott R Burks, Joseph A Frank

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 289 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
289citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

289 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 454 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Focused ultrasound for brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

229 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zsofia I KovacsFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; jf5z@nih.gov zsofia.kovacs@nih.gov.
Saejeong KimFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Neekita JikariaFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Farhan QureshiFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Blerta MiloFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Bobbi K LewisFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Michele BreslerFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Scott R BurksFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Joseph A FrankFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; jf5z@nih.gov zsofia.kovacs@nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Preclinical high intensity focused ultrasound: mechanisms and applicationsZIACL040014 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI FRANK, JOSEPH · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL040014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI-guided pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) combined with systemic infusion of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles (MB) causes localized blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption that is currently being advocated for increasing drug or gene delivery in neurological diseases. The mechanical acoustic cavitation effects of opening the BBB by low-intensity pFUS+MB, as evidenced by contrast-enhanced MRI, resulted in an immediate damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) response including elevations in heat-shock protein 70, IL-1, IL-18, and TNFα indicative of a sterile inflammatory response (SIR) in the parenchyma. Concurrent with DAMP presentation, significant elevations in proinflammatory, antiinflammatory, and trophic factors along with neurotrophic and neurogenesis factors were detected; these elevations lasted 24 h. Transcriptomic analysis of sonicated brain supported the proteomic findings and indicated that the SIR was facilitated through the induction of the NFκB pathway. Histological evaluation demonstrated increased albumin in the parenchyma that cleared by 24 h along with TUNEL

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsAstrocytesBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCell Adhesion MoleculesDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsInflammationInterleukin-1Interleukin-18MacrophagesMicrogliaNeurodegenerative DiseasesParenchymal TissueCell Adhesion MoleculesHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsInterleukin-1Interleukin-18Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphablood-brain barriermagnetic resonance imagingmicrobubblespulsed focused ultrasoundsterile inflammation

Identifiers

PMID27994152
PMCPMC5224365
OpenAlexW2564088374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.