Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27994146›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Persistence and biodegradation of oil at the ocean floor following Deepwater Horizon.

Sarah C Bagby, Christopher M Reddy, Christoph Aeppli, G Burch Fisher, David L Valentine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High hydrostatic pressure stimulates n-CCommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shell-by-Shell Functionalization of Inorganic Nanoparticles.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah C BagbyDepartment of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.
Christopher M ReddyDepartment of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543.
Christoph AeppliBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, ME 04544.
G Burch FisherJackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
David L ValentineDepartment of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; valentine@geol.ucsb.edu.
University of California, Santa Barbara · USBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster introduced an unprecedented discharge of oil into the deep Gulf of Mexico. Considerable uncertainty has persisted regarding the oil's fate and effects in the deep ocean. In this work we assess the compound-specific rates of biodegradation for 125 aliphatic, aromatic, and biomarker petroleum hydrocarbons that settled to the deep ocean floor following release from the damaged Macondo Well. Based on a dataset comprising measurements of up to 168 distinct hydrocarbon analytes in 2,980 sediment samples collected within 4 y of the spill, we develop a Macondo oil "fingerprint" and conservatively identify a subset of 312 surficial samples consistent with contamination by Macondo oil. Three trends emerge from analysis of the biodegradation rates of 125 individual hydrocarbons in these samples. First, molecular structure served to modulate biodegradation in a predictable fashion, with the simplest structures subject to fastest loss, indicating that biodegradation in the deep ocean progresses similarly to other environments. Second, for many alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons biodegradation occurred in two distinct phases, consistent with rapid loss while oil particles remained suspended followed by slow loss after deposition to the seafloor. Third, the extent of biodegradation for any given sample was influenced by the hydrocarbon content, leading to substantially greater hydrocarbon persistence among the more highly contaminated samples. In addition, under some conditions we find strong evidence for extensive degradation of numerous petroleum biomarkers, notably including the native internal standard 17α(H),21β(H)-hopane, commonly used to calculate the extent of oil weathering.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringAlkanesDisastersGeologic SedimentsGulf of AmericaHydrocarbonsOil and Gas FieldsPetroleumPetroleum PollutionPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAlkanesHydrocarbonsPetroleumPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalbiodegradationDeepwater Horizonhydrocarbonoil spillspetroleum biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID27994146
PMCPMC5224388
OpenAlexW2564313026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.