ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017
Waiting in the wings: what can we learn about gene co-option from the diversification of butterfly wing patterns?
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- A shared gene but distinct dynamics regulate mimicry polymorphisms in closely related butterfly species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Developmental rewiring of the NGAL/CUC/KLU network associated with pleiotropic roles of NGAL genes.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Turning lances into shields: flower mantids stretch their raptorial forelegs to avert and deflect predator attack.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Current evidence of climate-driven colour change in insects and its impact on sexual signals.Ecology and evolution · 2024Review
- Frizzled2 receives WntA signaling during butterfly wing pattern formation.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Acute and Long-Term Consequences of Co-opted doublesex on the Development of Mimetic Butterfly Color Patterns.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- High-quality haploid genomes corroborate 29 chromosomes and highly conserved synteny of genes in Hyles hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae).BMC genomics · 2023Article
- A cis-regulatory sequence of the selector gene vestigial drives the evolution of wing scaling in Drosophila species.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- Widespread Gene Expression Divergence in Butterfly Sensory Tissues Plays a Fundamental Role During Reproductive Isolation and Speciation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- A large deletion at the cortex locus eliminates butterfly wing patterning.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Asymmetric introgression reveals the genetic architecture of a plumage trait.Nature communications · 2021Article
- The evolution and genetics of sexually dimorphic 'dual' mimicry in the butterflyProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Lateral Gene Transfer Acts As an Evolutionary Shortcut to Efficient C4 Biochemistry.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Perfect mimicry betweenProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Temporal flexibility of gene regulatory network underlies a novel wing pattern in flies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Physical and behavioral adaptations to prevent overheating of the living wings of butterflies.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Modular cis-regulatory logic of yellow gene expression in silkmoth larvae.Insect molecular biology · 2019Article
- Conservation and flexibility in the gene regulatory landscape of heliconiine butterfly wings.EvoDevo · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge is to understand how conserved gene regulatory networks control the wonderful diversity of form that we see among animals and plants. Butterfly wing patterns are an excellent example of this diversity. Butterfly wings form as imaginal discs in the caterpillar and are constructed by a gene regulatory network, much of which is conserved across the holometabolous insects. Recent work in Heliconius butterflies takes advantage of genomic approaches and offers insights into how the diversification of wing patterns is overlaid onto this conserved network. WntA is a patterning morphogen that alters spatial information in the wing. Optix is a transcription factor that acts later in development to paint specific wing regions red. Both of these loci fit the paradigm of conserved protein-coding loci with diverse regulatory elements and developmental roles that have taken on novel derived functions in patterning wings. These discoveries offer insights into the 'Nymphalid Ground Plan', which offers a unifying hypothesis for pattern formation across nymphalid butterflies. These loci also represent 'hotspots' for morphological change that have been targeted repeatedly during evolution. Both convergent and divergent evolution of a great diversity of patterns is controlled by complex alleles at just a few genes. We suggest that evolutionary change has become focused on one or a few genetic loci for two reasons. First, pre-existing complex cis-regulatory loci that already interact with potentially relevant transcription factors are more likely to acquire novel functions in wing patterning. Second, the shape of wing regulatory networks may constrain evolutionary change to one or a few loci. Overall, genomic approaches that have identified wing patterning loci in these butterflies offer broad insight into how gene regulatory networks evolve to produce diversity.This article is part of the themed issue 'Evo-devo in the genomics era, and the origins of morphological diversity'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.