ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2017
Diffusion-weighted imaging is a sensitive biomarker of response to biologic therapy in enthesitis-related arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2019Pooled it
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Evaluation of the Sacroiliac Joint in Pediatric Patients.Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Molecular Imaging of the Painful Knee.Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology · 2023Review
- Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Enthesitis-Related Arthritis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) in axial spondyloarthritis.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Histographic analysis of oedema and fat in inflamed bone marrow based on quantitative MRI.European radiology · 2020Article
- Usefulness of magnetic resonance enterography in detecting signs of sacroiliitis in young patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2020Article
- Test-retest repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient in sacroiliac joint MRI in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy individuals.Acta radiologica open · 2020Article
- Article
- Validation of assessment methods for the apparent diffusion coefficient in a clinical trial of axial spondyloarthritis patients treated with golimumab.European journal of radiology open · 2020Article
- Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- The role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of axial spondyloarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2019Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliitis in children: frequency of findings and interobserver reliability.Pediatric radiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The aim was to evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a tool for measuring treatment response in adolescents with enthesitis-related arthropathy (ERA). Methods: Twenty-two adolescents with ERA underwent routine MRI and DWI before and after TNF inhibitor therapy. Each patient's images were visually scored by two radiologists using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada system, and sacroiliac joint apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized ADC (nADC) were measured for each patient. Therapeutic clinical response was defined as an improvement of ⩾ 30% physician global assessment and radiological response defined as ⩾ 2.5-point reduction in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada score. We compared ADC and nADC changes in responders and non-responders using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. Results: For both radiological and clinical definitions of response, reductions in ADC and nADC after treatment were greater in responders than in non-responders (for radiological response: ADC: P < 0.01; nADC: P = 0.055; for clinical response: ADC: P = 0.33; nADC: P = 0.089). ADC and nADC could predict radiological response with a high level of sensitivity and specificity and were moderately sensitive and specific predictors of clinical response (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were as follows: ADC: 0.97, nADC: 0.82 for radiological response; and ADC: 0.67, nADC: 0.78 for clinical response). Conclusion: DWI measurements reflect the response to TNF inhibitor treatment in ERA patients with sacroiliitis as defined using radiological criteria and may also reflect clinical response. DWI is more objective than visual scoring and has the potential to be automated. ADC/nADC could be used as biomarkers of sacroiliitis in the clinic and in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.