Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27994066›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2017

Phase III randomized study of radiation and temozolomide versus radiation and nitrosourea therapy for anaplastic astrocytoma: results of NRG Oncology RTOG 9813.

Susan Chang, Peixin Zhang, J Gregory Cairncross, Mark R Gilbert, Jean-Paul Bahary, Carol A Dolinskas, Arnab Chakravarti, Kenneth D Aldape, Erica H Bell, David Schiff and 12 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM clinical guidelines for anaplastic gliomas (2017).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Multidisciplinary Management of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutated Gliomas in a Contemporary Molecularly Defined Era.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  15. State of the Art in Low-Grade Glioma Management: Insights From Isocitrate Dehydrogenase and Beyond.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024
    Review
  16. Updates on management of gliomas in the molecular age.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Current Considerations in the Treatment of Grade 3 Gliomas.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan ChangUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Peixin ZhangNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Gregory CairncrossUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Mark R GilbertUniversity of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jean-Paul BaharyCentre Hospitalier de l`Université de Montréal-Notre Dame, Montréal, Canada.
Carol A DolinskasUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Arnab ChakravartiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kenneth D AldapeMacFeeters Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology, Toronto, Canada.
Erica H BellThe Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
David SchiffUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kurt JaeckleMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Paul D BrownUniversity of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Geoffrey R BargerWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Maria Werner-WasikThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Helen ShihMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David BrachmanArizona Oncology Services Foundation, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Marta Penas-PradoUniversity of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
H Ian RobinsUniversity of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Karl BelangerCentre Hospitalier de l`Université de Montréal-Notre Dame, Montréal, Canada.
Christopher SchultzMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Grant HunterIntermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah, USA.
Minesh MehtaUniversity of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Arizona Oncology · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAIntermountain Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWinnMed · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Brain Tumor Clinical and Clinical Research Program (Clinical Support Services)ZIDBC011642 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI OZER, BYRAM · 2015 to 2025
$23.4M
OSU as a Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCI NCTNUG1CA233331 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI John L. Hays, Dwight H. Owen · 2019 to 2026
$8.9M
Genetic evolution of glioblastomas during radiation and temozolomide therapyR01CA188228 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BEROUKHIM, RAMEEN, CHAKRAVARTI, ARNAB · 2015 to 2025
$6.9M
Therapeutic Exploitation of Mutant BRAF for AstrocytomaR01CA169368 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HOUGHTON, PETER J · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169368NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188228NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The primary objective of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) treated with radiotherapy (RT) and either temozolomide (TMZ) or a nitrosourea (NU). Secondary endpoints were time to tumor progression (TTP), toxicity, and the effect of IDH1 mutation status on clinical outcome. Methods: Eligible patients with centrally reviewed, histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed AA were randomized to receive either RT+TMZ (n = 97) or RT+NU (n = 99). The study closed early because the target accrual rate was not met. Results: Median follow-up time for patients still alive was 10.1 years (1.9-12.6 y); 66% of the patients died. Median survival time was 3.9 years in the RT/TMZ arm (95% CI, 3.0-7.0) and 3.8 years in the RT/NU arm (95% CI, 2.2-7.0), corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.94 (P = .36; 95% CI, 0.67-1.32). The differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and TTP between the 2 arms were not statistically significant. Patients in the RT+NU arm experienced more grade ≥3 toxicity (75.8% vs 47.9%, P < .001), mainly related to myelosuppression. Of the 196 patients, 111 were tested for IDH1-R132H status (60 RT+TMZ and 51 RT+NU). Fifty-four patients were IDH negative and 49 were IDH positive with a better OS in IDH-positive patients (median survival time 7.9 vs 2.8 y; P = .004, HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81). Conclusions: RT+TMZ did not appear to significantly improve OS or TTP for AA compared with RT+ NU. RT+TMZ was better tolerated. IDH1-R132H mutation was associated with longer survival.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAstrocytomaBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkers, TumorDacarbazineNitrosourea CompoundsTemozolomideanaplastic astrocytomanitrosourearadiotherapytemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID27994066
PMCPMC5463834
OpenAlexW2565057278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.