ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2017
Structural identifiability of equilibrium ligand-binding parameters.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Bayesian priors to overcome non-identifiablility issues in Hidden Markov models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Bioelectricity and molecular signaling.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Classical structural identifiability methodology applied to low-dimensional dynamic systems in receptor theory.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Article
- Identifiability of equilibrium constants for receptors with two to five binding sites.The Journal of general physiology · 2023Article
- Benzodiazepine Modulation of GABABiomolecules · 2022Review
- The surprising difficulty of "simple" equilibrium binding measurements on ligand-gated ion channels.The Journal of general physiology · 2022Article
- A strategy for determining the equilibrium constants for heteromeric ion channels in a complex model.The Journal of general physiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Non-Additive Effects of Binding Site Mutations in Calmodulin.Biochemistry · 2019Article
- Models to determine the kinetic mechanisms of ion-coupled transporters.The Journal of general physiology · 2019Article
- Coordination to lanthanide ions distorts binding site conformation in calmodulin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Estimating kinetic mechanisms with prior knowledge II: Behavioral constraints and numerical tests.The Journal of general physiology · 2018Article
- Identifiability, reducibility, and adaptability in allosteric macromolecules.The Journal of general physiology · 2017Article
- The structure of binding curves and practical identifiability of equilibrium ligand-binding parameters.The Journal of general physiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the interactions of proteins with their ligands requires knowledge of molecular properties, such as binding site affinities and the effects that binding at one site exerts on binding at other sites (cooperativity). These properties cannot be measured directly and are usually estimated by fitting binding data with models that contain these quantities as parameters. In this study, we present a general method for answering the critical question of whether these parameters are identifiable (i.e., whether their estimates are accurate and unique). In cases in which parameter estimates are not unique, our analysis provides insight into the fundamental causes of nonidentifiability. This approach can thus serve as a guide for the proper design and analysis of protein-ligand binding experiments. We show that the equilibrium total binding relation can be reduced to a conserved mathematical form for all models composed solely of bimolecular association reactions and to a related, conserved form for all models composed of arbitrary combinations of binding and conformational equilibria. This canonical mathematical structure implies a universal parameterization of the binding relation that is consistent with virtually any physically reasonable binding model, for proteins with any number of binding sites. Matrix algebraic methods are used to prove that these universal parameter sets are structurally identifiable (SI; i.e., identifiable under conditions of noiseless data). A general approach for assessing and understanding the factors governing practical identifiability (i.e., the identifiability under conditions of real, noisy data) of these SI parameter sets is presented in the companion paper by Middendorf and Aldrich (2017. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201611703).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.