ArticleBMJ open2016
Enhancing risk stratification for use in integrated care: a cluster analysis of high-risk patients in a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Population risk stratification tools and interventions for chronic disease management in primary care: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying and characterizing subgroups of medically complex older patients in community-based intermediate care: a latent class analysis of Danish municipal temporary stay patients.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling for identification of older adults with high utilization of health and social services.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Article
- Identifying individuals with intellectual disability who access mental health support and are at high risk for adverse clinical outcomes: cohort study.BJPsych open · 2023Article
- A systematic review of risk stratification tools internationally used in primary care settings.Health science reports · 2021Review
- Elements and Performance Indicators of Integrated Healthcare Programmes on Chronic Diseases in Six Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Use of Latent Class Analysis and k-Means Clustering to Identify Complex Patient Profiles.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Article
- Tailoring integrated care services for high-risk patients with multiple chronic conditions: a risk stratification approach using cluster analysis.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on the Secondary Use of Health Records to Improve Quality and Safety of Care in England: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Characterization of high healthcare utilizer groups using administrative data from an electronic medical record database.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo show how segmentation can enhance risk stratification tools for integrated care, by providing insight into different care usage patterns within the high-risk population.
designA retrospective cohort study. A risk score was calculated for each person using a logistic regression, which was then used to select the top 5% high-risk individuals. This population was segmented based on the usage of different care settings using a k-means cluster analysis. Data from 2008 to 2011 were used to create the risk score and segments, while 2012 data were used to understand the predictive abilities of the models. SETTING AND
participantsData were collected from administrative data sets covering primary and secondary care for a random sample of 300 000 English patients. MAIN MEASURES: The high-risk population was segmented based on their usage of 4 different care settings: emergency acute care, elective acute care, outpatient care and GP care.
resultsWhile the risk strata predicted care usage at a high level, within the high-risk population, usage varied significantly. 4 different groups of high-risk patients could be identified. These 4 segments had distinct usage patterns across care settings, reflecting different levels and types of care needs. The 2008-2011 usage patterns of the 4 segments were consistent with the 2012 patterns. DISCUSSION: Cluster analyses revealed that the high-risk population is not homogeneous, as there exist 4 groups of patients with different needs across the care continuum. Since the patterns were predictive of future care use, they can be used to develop integrated care programmes tailored to these different groups.
conclusionsUsage-based segmentation augments risk stratification by identifying patient groups with different care needs, around which integrated care programmes can be designed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.