Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27993899›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Barriers to self-management of chronic pain in primary care: a qualitative focus group study.

Katy Gordon, Helen Rice, Nick Allcock, Pamela Bell, Martin Dunbar, Steve Gilbert, Heather Wallace

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Healthcare resource utilization for chronic low back pain among high-utilizers.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of a pain self-management intervention framework for people with spinal cord injury.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What do people need?Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katy GordonPain Concern, Edinburgh.
Helen RiceWork4ME, Paisley.
Nick AllcockGlasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow.
Pamela BellPain Alliance of Northern Ireland, Belfast.
Martin DunbarNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow.
Steve GilbertConsultant in anaesthetics and pain management, NHS Fife, Dunfermline.
Heather WallacePain Concern, Edinburgh.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupported self-management is a recommended intervention for chronic pain. Effective self-management should enable an individual to reduce the impact of pain on their everyday life. Clinical guidelines suggest primary care services have a role to play in supporting self-management of chronic pain.

aimTo examine the opinions of primary care healthcare professionals (HCPs) and people with chronic pain and their carers, in order to identify possible barriers to the facilitation and adoption of self-management. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study using focus groups in locations throughout Scotland.

methodEighteen focus groups were held with patients and HCPs. Fifty-four patients, nine carers, and 38 HCPs attended the groups.

resultsFour categories of barriers were found. 1) Patient-HCP consultation: some patients felt a discussion about self-management came too late or not at all. Communication and building positive relations were sometimes challenging. 2) Patient experience: the emotional impact of pain was difficult and patients often felt unsupported by HCPs. 3) Limited treatment options: some participants felt there was a tendency for overmedicalisation. 4) Organisational constraints: short appointment times, long waiting lists, and a compartmentalised NHS created challenges.

conclusionThis study illustrates some of the barriers faced by HCPs and patients in the facilitation and adoption of self-management of chronic pain. If self-management is to be an important approach to chronic pain, primary care services need to be designed to address the barriers identified.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsPrimary Health CareAttitude to HealthCaregiversChronic PainComorbidityHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchScotlandSelf Carechronic painlong-term conditionsprimary carequalitative researchself-management

Identifiers

PMID27993899
PMCPMC5325663
OpenAlexW2573798860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.