Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27993794›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG): clinical trial design for rare ovarian tumours.

A F Leary, M Quinn, K Fujiwara, R L Coleman, E Kohn, T Sugiyama, R Glasspool, I Ray-Coquard, N Colombo, M Bacon and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Rare Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Low Grade Serous and Mucinous Carcinomas.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Update on new treatments for rare ovarian tumours.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

A F LearyINSERM U981 Gynaecological Tumours, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.
M QuinnANZGOG Coordinating Centre, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
K FujiwaraGOTIC, Japan.
R L ColemanG-GOC, Bethesda, USA.
E KohnNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
T SugiyamaJGOG, Japan.
R GlasspoolSGCTG, UK.
I Ray-CoquardINSERM U981 Gynaecological Tumours, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.
N ColomboMaNGO, Italy.
M BaconGCIG, Japan.
A ZeimetAGO-AU, Austria.
A WestermannDGOG, The Netherlands.
E Gomez-GarciaGICOM, Mexico.
D ProvencherCCTG, Vancouver, Canada.
S WelchPMHC, Canada.
W SmallRTOG, USA.
D MillanSGCTG, UK.
A OkamotoJGOG, Japan.
G StuartCCTG, Vancouver, Canada.
K OchiaiJGOG, Japan.
participants of the Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRAGO Austria · ATGeneral Oceanics (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Health and Medical Research Council · AURTOG Foundation · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Cancer Research UK 15600NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript reports the consensus statements on designing clinical trials in rare ovarian tumours reached at the fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (OCCC) held in Tokyo, November 2015. Three important questions were identified concerning rare ovarian tumours (rare epithelial ovarian cancers (eOC), sex-cord stromal tumours (SCST) and germ cell tumours (GCT)): (i) What are the research and trial issues that are unique to rare ovarian tumours? There is a lack of randomised phase III data defining standards of care which makes it difficult to define control arms, but identifies unmet needs that merit investigation. Internationally agreed upon diagnostic criteria, expert pathological review and translational research are crucial. (ii) What should be investigated in rare eOC, GCT and SCST? Trials dedicated to each rare ovarian tumour should be encouraged. Nonetheless, where the question is relevant, rare eOC can be included in eOC trials but with rigorous stratification. Although there is emerging evidence suggesting that rare eOC have different molecular profiles, trials are needed to define new type-specific standards for each rare eOC (clear cell, low grade serous and mucinous). For GCTs, a priority is reducing toxicities from treatment while maintaining cure rates. Both a robust prognostic scoring system and more effective treatments for de novo poor prognosis and relapsed GCTs are needed. For SCSTs, validated prognostic markers as well as alternatives to the current standard of bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin (BEP) should be identified. (iii) Are randomised trials feasible? Randomised controlled trials (RCT) should be feasible in any of the rare tumours through international collaboration. Ongoing trials have already demonstrated the feasibility of RCT in rare eOC and SCST. Mucinous OC may be considered for inclusion, stratified, into RCTs of non-gynaecological mucinous tumours, while RCTs in high risk or relapsed GCT may be carried out as a subset of male and/or paediatric germ cell studies.

Indexed as

Research DesignFemaleHumansOvarian Neoplasmsclinical trialsrare ovarian tumours

Identifiers

PMID27993794
PMCPMC6246130
OpenAlexW2560928882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.