Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27993786›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

DeFCoM: analysis and modeling of transcription factor binding sites using a motif-centric genomic footprinter.

Bryan Quach, Terrence S Furey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Chromatin accessibility profiling methods.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Analytical Approaches for ATAC-seq Data Analysis.Current protocols in human genetics · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bryan QuachCurriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.
Terrence S FureyDepartment of Genetics.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Genes, genomes, and genotoxicity: in vivo epigenetic toxicology of 1,3-butadieneR01ES023195 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CRAWFORD, GREGORY E, FUREY, TERRENCE S. · 2013 to 2016
$2.2M
Interpreting molecular role of DNA variants associated with Crohn's Disease through integrative analysis of open chromatin, epigenome and transcriptome data in diverse and relevant tissues and cellsR01ES024983 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FUREY, TERRENCE S., SHEIKH, SHEHZAD Z. · 2014 to 2015
$588k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES023195NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024983NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Identifying the locations of transcription factor binding sites is critical for understanding how gene transcription is regulated across different cell types and conditions. Chromatin accessibility experiments such as DNaseI sequencing (DNase-seq) and Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) produce genome-wide data that include distinct 'footprint' patterns at binding sites. Nearly all existing computational methods to detect footprints from these data assume that footprint signals are highly homogeneous across footprint sites. Additionally, a comprehensive and systematic comparison of footprinting methods for specifically identifying which motif sites for a specific factor are bound has not been performed. Results: Using DNase-seq data from the ENCODE project, we show that a large degree of previously uncharacterized site-to-site variability exists in footprint signal across motif sites for a transcription factor. To model this heterogeneity in the data, we introduce a novel, supervised learning footprinter called Detecting Footprints Containing Motifs (DeFCoM). We compare DeFCoM to nine existing methods using evaluation sets from four human cell-lines and eighteen transcription factors and show that DeFCoM outperforms current methods in determining bound and unbound motif sites. We also analyze the impact of several biological and technical factors on the quality of footprint predictions to highlight important considerations when conducting footprint analyses and assessing the performance of footprint prediction methods. Finally, we show that DeFCoM can detect footprints using ATAC-seq data with similar accuracy as when using DNase-seq data. Availability and Implementation: Python code available at https://bitbucket.org/bryancquach/defcom. Contact: bquach@email.unc.edu or tsfurey@email.unc.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularSoftwareArea Under CurveBase SequenceBinding SitesDeoxyribonuclease IDNA FootprintingGenomicsHumansK562 CellsNucleotide MotifsProtein BindingSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsDeoxyribonuclease ITranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27993786
PMCPMC6075477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.