ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
DeFCoM: analysis and modeling of transcription factor binding sites using a motif-centric genomic footprinter.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of non-coding variants associated with transcription-factor binding through ATAC-seq-defined footprint QTLs in liver.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- ChromBPNet: bias factorized, base-resolution deep learning models of chromatin accessibility reveal cis-regulatory sequence syntax, transcription factor footprints and regulatory variants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Chromatin accessibility profile and the role of PeAtf1 transcription factor in the postharvest pathogenHorticulture research · 2025Article
- Predicting CTCF cell type active binding sites in human genome.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cellular zinc status alters chromatin accessibility and binding of p53 to DNA.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Cellular zinc status alters chromatin accessibility and binding of transcription factor p53 to genomic sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- TAMC: A deep-learning approach to predict motif-centric transcriptional factor binding activity based on ATAC-seq profile.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Epigenetic Regulation of Endothelial Cell Lineages During Zebrafish Development-New Insights From Technical Advances.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Comprehensive understanding of Tn5 insertion preference improves transcription regulatory element identification.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Epitome: predicting epigenetic events in novel cell types with multi-cell deep ensemble learning.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- The native cistrome and sequence motif families of the maize ear.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Evidence of widespread, independent sequence signature for transcription factor cobinding.Genome research · 2021Article
- Interrogating the Accessible Chromatin Landscape of Eukaryote Genomes Using ATAC-seq.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Chromatin accessibility profiling methods.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021Article
- TRACE: transcription factor footprinting using chromatin accessibility data and DNA sequence.Genome research · 2020Article
- Sequence and chromatin determinants of transcription factor binding and the establishment of cell type-specific binding patterns.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2020Review
- Analytical Approaches for ATAC-seq Data Analysis.Current protocols in human genetics · 2020Article
- Quantification, Dynamic Visualization, and Validation of Bias in ATAC-Seq Data with ataqv.Cell systems · 2020Article
- From reads to insight: a hitchhiker's guide to ATAC-seq data analysis.Genome biology · 2020Review
- A comprehensive review of computational prediction of genome-wide features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Identifying the locations of transcription factor binding sites is critical for understanding how gene transcription is regulated across different cell types and conditions. Chromatin accessibility experiments such as DNaseI sequencing (DNase-seq) and Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) produce genome-wide data that include distinct 'footprint' patterns at binding sites. Nearly all existing computational methods to detect footprints from these data assume that footprint signals are highly homogeneous across footprint sites. Additionally, a comprehensive and systematic comparison of footprinting methods for specifically identifying which motif sites for a specific factor are bound has not been performed. Results: Using DNase-seq data from the ENCODE project, we show that a large degree of previously uncharacterized site-to-site variability exists in footprint signal across motif sites for a transcription factor. To model this heterogeneity in the data, we introduce a novel, supervised learning footprinter called Detecting Footprints Containing Motifs (DeFCoM). We compare DeFCoM to nine existing methods using evaluation sets from four human cell-lines and eighteen transcription factors and show that DeFCoM outperforms current methods in determining bound and unbound motif sites. We also analyze the impact of several biological and technical factors on the quality of footprint predictions to highlight important considerations when conducting footprint analyses and assessing the performance of footprint prediction methods. Finally, we show that DeFCoM can detect footprints using ATAC-seq data with similar accuracy as when using DNase-seq data. Availability and Implementation: Python code available at https://bitbucket.org/bryancquach/defcom. Contact: bquach@email.unc.edu or tsfurey@email.unc.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.