Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27993776›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

fCCAC: functional canonical correlation analysis to evaluate covariance between nucleic acid sequencing datasets.

Pedro Madrigal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional data analysis for computational biology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pedro MadrigalWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Computational evaluation of variability across DNA or RNA sequencing datasets is a crucial step in genomic science, as it allows both to evaluate reproducibility of biological or technical replicates, and to compare different datasets to identify their potential correlations. Here we present fCCAC, an application of functional canonical correlation analysis to assess covariance of nucleic acid sequencing datasets such as chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq). We show how this method differs from other measures of correlation, and exemplify how it can reveal shared covariance between histone modifications and DNA binding proteins, such as the relationship between the H3K4me3 chromatin mark and its epigenetic writers and readers. Availability and Implementation: An R/Bioconductor package is available at http://bioconductor.org/packages/fCCAC/ . Contact: pmb59@cam.ac.uk. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

SoftwareChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationEpigenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistonesHumansMethylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNAChromatinHistones

Identifiers

PMID27993776
PMCPMC5408813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.