ArticleBehavioural brain research2017
Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating US smokers' willingness to pay for different cigarette packaging designs before and after real-world exposure in a randomised trial.Tobacco control · 2023Trial
- Representations of the intrinsic value of information in mouse orbitofrontal cortex.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Dopamine receptor sensitivity, cocaine-induced behaviors, and Pavlovian conditioned approach in male rats.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Effects of methamphetamine on signalled probability in rats using concurrent chains.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Dopamine receptor sensitivity and Pavlovian conditioned approach.Research square · 2025Article
- Do goldfish like to be informed?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- A Common Stay-on-Goal Mechanism in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Information and Effort Choices.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Rats' performance in a suboptimal choice procedure implemented in a natural-foraging analogue.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- Narrative framing may increase human suboptimal choice behavior.Learning & behavior · 2024Article
- Human Behavior in Suboptimal Choice Tasks: Defining Optimality.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024Article
- On the value of advanced information about delayed rewards.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- Paradoxical choice and the reinforcing value of information.Animal cognition · 2023Article
- Sign tracking predicts suboptimal behavior in a rodent gambling task.Psychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Quantifying value-based determinants of drug and non-drug decision dynamics.Psychopharmacology · 2021Article
- The functional equivalence of two variants of the suboptimal choice task: choice proportion and response latency as measures of value.Animal cognition · 2021Article
- Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates.Learning & behavior · 2020Article
- Contribution of alcohol- and cigarette-related cues to concurrent reinforcer choice in humans.Behavioural processes · 2020Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Animal Models of Gambling-like Behavior.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2020Article
- Human Choice Predicted by Obtained Reinforcers, Not by Reinforcement Predictors.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Contribution of cannabis-related cues to concurrent reinforcer choice in humans.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stimuli that are more predictive of subsequent reward also function as better conditioned reinforcers. Moreover, stimuli attributed with incentive salience function as more robust conditioned reinforcers. Some theories have suggested that conditioned reinforcement plays an important role in promoting suboptimal choice behavior, like gambling. The present experiments examined how different stimuli, those attributed with incentive salience versus those without, can function in tandem with stimulus-reward predictive utility to promote maladaptive decision-making in rats. One group of rats had lights associated with goal-tracking as the reward-predictive stimuli and another had levers associated with sign-tracking as the reward-predictive stimuli. All rats were first trained on a choice procedure in which the expected value across both alternatives was equivalent but differed in their stimulus-reward predictive utility. Next, the expected value across both alternatives was systematically changed so that the alternative with greater stimulus-reward predictive utility was suboptimal in regard to primary reinforcement. The results demonstrate that in order to obtain suboptimal choice behavior, incentive salience alongside strong stimulus-reward predictive utility may be necessary; thus, maladaptive decision-making can be driven more by the value attributed to stimuli imbued with incentive salience that reliably predict a reward rather than the reward itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.