Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27993632›Full record

ArticleResuscitation2017

ECMO Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR), trends in survival from an international multicentre cohort study over 12-years.

Alexander Sacha C Richardson, Matthieu Schmidt, Michael Bailey, Vincent A Pellegrino, Peter T Rycus, David V Pilcher

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander Sacha C RichardsonDepartment of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: s.richardson@doctors.org.uk.
Matthieu SchmidtMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, iCAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hopital de la Pitié-Salpetrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 47-83 bd de l'Hopital, Paris 75651, France.
Michael BaileyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Vincent A PellegrinoDepartment of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter T RycusExtracorporeal Life Support Organization, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
David V PilcherDepartment of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being deployed as an adjunct to conventional CPR. It is unknown if this has been associated with improved outcomes.

aimsTo describe trends in survival and patient demographics for ECPR patients in the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (ELSO) database over the past 12 years and identify factors associated with changes in survival.

methodsPatients greater than 16 years of age who received ECPR between January 2003 and December 2014 were extracted from the ELSO registry and were divided into three 4-year cohorts (Cohort 1: 2003-2006, Cohort 2: 2007-2010, Cohort 3: 2011-2014). Univariable analysis was performed to compare demographics and outcomes of patients across the three cohorts. Univariable and multivariable analyses were then performed to identify factors independently associated with survival.

results1796 patients treated with ECPR were extracted from the registry, aged 50 (±18.5) years. Annual ECPR episodes increased over 10-fold, from 35 to over 400 per year. Survival to hospital discharge was 29% overall (27% cohort 1, 28% cohort 2, 30% cohort 3 (p=0.71)). Age, body weight and documented comorbidities increased over time. There was a reduction in complications associated with ECMO usage. After adjusting for confounders there was no change in the odds of survival over the time period examined.

interpretationOver the period 2003-2014, survival to hospital discharge was 29% for patients who require ECPR. Despite advances in provision of ECMO care and increasing co-morbidities of patients, there has been no change in risk-adjusted survival over time.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCohort StudiesExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHeart ArrestHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateCardio Pulmonary ResuscitationCPRECMOECMO-CPRECPRELSOExtracorporeal Life Support OrganisationExtra-Corporeal Membrane OxygenationExtra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation assisted Cardio Pulmonary ResuscitationExtra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)SAVE scoresurvival after VA-ECMO scoreVAveno-arterialveno-venousVV

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.