ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2017
A genome-based model for adjusting radiotherapy dose (GARD): a retrospective, cohort-based study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04738214 (Development of a Genome-based Platform for Personalized Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 258 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of a Genome-based Platform for Personalized Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
Who cites it
258 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 463 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic spinal sarcomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Mutational profile of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in relation to HPV, tobacco smoking and prognosis with validation in the DAHANCA 19 randomized trial.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Trial
- Association between Locoregional Failure and NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 Mutations in NRG/RTOG 9512: A Randomized Trial of Radiation Fractionation in T2N0 Glottic Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Association Between 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Score and Locoregional Recurrence Rates in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2020Trial
- Low-dose radiotherapy as an immunomodulator in cancer: dose-specific mechanisms and hybrid high-dose/low-dose strategies.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Effective tumor kinetics inferred from single routine H&E biopsies enable counterfactual virtual radiotherapy trials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities in combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy for localized pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Relationship between radiosensitivity of peripheral blood lymphocytes, breast cancer cells, and breast cancer stem cells in patients with breast cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Identification of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy resistance-associated proteins in locally advanced rectal cancer: A pilot study.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Biomarkers of radioresistance in lung cancer: Current insights and future directions (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Toward a Conceptual Multiscale Framework for Predictive Radiobiology: Integrating Genomic Damage, Network Rewiring, and Tissue Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advancing Particle Therapy to Improve Cancer Care: Report on "2nd World Forum on Particle Therapy".International journal of particle therapy · 2026Review
- Adaptive and sequential cancer therapies emerge from treatment schedule optimization.Research square · 2026Article
- Three-Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) debate: Medical physics should focus less on geometric precision and more on biological outcomes.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Radiosensitivity index stability across glioma progression: a longitudinal bulk and single-cell analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Toward genomic personalization of breast cancer radiotherapy: foundations, challenges, and a roadmap for clinical integration.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy Technologists in Head and Neck Cancer: A Narrative Review and Operational Framework.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Analysis of the Radiosensitivity Index in Paired Preneoadjuvant and Postneoadjuvant Therapy Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- A prescription-free, radiobiology-based framework for automated VMAT planning: A feasibility study in primary prostate cancer radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
198 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite its common use in cancer treatment, radiotherapy has not yet entered the era of precision medicine, and there have been no approaches to adjust dose based on biological differences between or within tumours. We aimed to assess whether a patient-specific molecular signature of radiation sensitivity could be used to identify the optimum radiotherapy dose.
methodsWe used the gene-expression-based radiation-sensitivity index and the linear quadratic model to derive the genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD). A high GARD value predicts for high therapeutic effect for radiotherapy; which we postulate would relate to clinical outcome. Using data from the prospective, observational Total Cancer Care (TCC) protocol, we calculated GARD for primary tumours from 20 disease sites treated using standard radiotherapy doses for each disease type. We also used multivariable Cox modelling to assess whether GARD was independently associated with clinical outcome in five clinical cohorts: Erasmus Breast Cancer Cohort (n=263); Karolinska Breast Cancer Cohort (n=77); Moffitt Lung Cancer Cohort (n=60); Moffitt Pancreas Cancer Cohort (n=40); and The Cancer Genome Atlas Glioblastoma Patient Cohort (n=98).
findingsWe calculated GARD for 8271 tissue samples from the TCC cohort. There was a wide range of GARD values (range 1·66-172·4) across the TCC cohort despite assignment of uniform radiotherapy doses within disease types. Median GARD values were lowest for gliomas and sarcomas and highest for cervical cancer and oropharyngeal head and neck cancer. There was a wide range of GARD values within tumour type groups. GARD independently predicted clinical outcome in breast cancer, lung cancer, glioblastoma, and pancreatic cancer. In the Erasmus Breast Cancer Cohort, 5-year distant-metastasis-free survival was longer in patients with high GARD values than in those with low GARD values (hazard ratio 2·11, 95% 1·13-3·94, p=0·018).
interpretationA GARD-based clinical model could allow the individualisation of radiotherapy dose to tumour radiosensitivity and could provide a framework to design genomically-guided clinical trials in radiation oncology.
fundingNone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.