Trial reportTrials2016
The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02868710 (The Incidence of Training Responsiveness to Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiometabolic Measurements Following Individualized and Standardized Exercise Prescription), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Incidence of Training Responsiveness to Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiometabolic Measurements Following Individualized and Standardized Exercise Prescription
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effects of Standardised versus Individualised Aerobic Exercise Prescription on Fitness-Fatness Index in Sedentary Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2022Trial
- Changes in the Second Ventilatory Threshold Following Individualised versus Standardised Exercise Prescription among Physically Inactive Adults: A Randomised Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Personalized Moderate-Intensity Exercise Training Combined with High-Intensity Interval Training Enhances Training Responsiveness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Trial
- Changes in Metabolic Syndrome Severity Following Individualized Versus Standardized Exercise Prescription: A Feasibility Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Trial
- Effects of amount, intensity, and mode of exercise training on the metabolic syndrome: A narrative review.Sports medicine and health science · 2025Review
- Exercise heart rates determined by a ventilatory threshold vs. standardized equation methods in individuals with metabolic syndrome.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cardiopulmonary endurance-training responsiveness of metabolic syndrome patients to individualized and standardized exercise prescriptions: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- School-based physical activity and health-related fitness in Mediterranean students: findings from the DELICIOUS project.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The need for tailoring school-based physical activity interventions: preliminary insights into body weight and cross-country differences from the DELICIOUS project.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- High-intensity interval training prevents muscle mass loss in overweight Chilean young adults during a hypocaloric-Mediterranean diet: a randomized trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Unsupervised cluster analysis reveals distinct subgroups in healthy population with different exercise responses of cardiorespiratory fitness.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2023Article
- Stubborn Exercise Responders-Where to Next?Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of a 12-Week High- vs. Low-Intensity Exercise Intervention on Hippocampal Structure and Function in Healthy, Young Adults.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Learning From Human Responses to Deconditioning Environments: Improved Understanding of the "Use It or Lose It" Principle.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Review
- A Discussion on Different Approaches for Prescribing Physical Interventions - Four Roads Lead to Rome, but Which One Should We Choose?Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- New Directions in Exercise Prescription: Is There a Role for Brain-Derived Parameters Obtained by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy?Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Inter-Individual Different Responses to Continuous and Interval Training in Recreational Middle-Aged Women Runners.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Inter-Individual Variability in Metabolic Syndrome Severity Score and VOInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Time Course Changes in Confirmed 'True' VOSports medicine international open · 2019Article
- Dose-Response Matters! - A Perspective on the Exercise Prescription in Exercise-Cognition Research.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is individual variability to cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) training, but the underlying cause is not well understood. Traditionally, a standardized approach to exercise prescription has utilized relative percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve (HRR), maximal oxygen uptake (VO
methodsIn this randomized control trial, participants will undergo a 12-week exercise intervention using individualized (ventilatory thresholds) and standardized (HRR) methods to prescribe CRF training intensity. Following the intervention, participants will be categorized as responders or non-responders based on changes in maximal aerobic abilities. Participants who are non-responders will complete a second 12-week intervention in a crossover design to determine whether they can become responders with a differing exercise prescription. There are four main research outcomes: (1) determine the cohort-specific technical error to use in the categorization of response rate; (2) determine if an individualized intensity prescription is superior to a standard approach in regards to VO DISCUSSION: The findings from this research will provide evidence on the effectiveness of individualized exercise prescription related to training responsiveness of VO
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02868710 . Registered on 15 August 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.