ReviewActa veterinaria Scandinavica2016
Identification and characterization of cancer stem cells in canine mammary tumors.
Review in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing EGFR Inhibition: Monensin and Erlotinib Synergize to Eliminate Cancer Stem Cells in Canine Mammary Tumours.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026Article
- Towards Personalized Medicine: Microdevice-Assisted Evaluation of Cancer Stem Cell Dynamics and Treatment Response.Cancers · 2025Article
- Effect of Melatonin on Chemoresistance Exhibited by Spheres Derived from Canine Mammary Carcinoma Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensional Cultivation a Valuable Tool for Modelling Canine Mammary Gland Tumour Behaviour In Vitro.Cells · 2024Review
- Canine Mammary Tumors: Classification, Biomarkers, Traditional and Personalized Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Concurrent primary splenic lymphoma and mammary gland tumour with polycystic ovaries in a dog.Veterinarni medicina · 2024Article
- Beyond tradition and convention: benefits of non-traditional model organisms in cancer research.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2021Review
- An epigenetic screening determines BET proteins as targets to suppress self-renewal and tumorigenicity in canine mammary cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Melatonin decreases in vitro viability and migration of spheres derived from CF41.Mg canine mammary carcinoma cells.BMC veterinary research · 2019Article
- Current biomarkers of canine mammary tumors.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2018Review
- An integrated computational and experimental study uncovers FUT9 as a metabolic driver of colorectal cancer.Molecular systems biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer stem cells (CSC) represent a small subpopulation of cells in malignant tumors that possess the unique ability to self-renew, differentiate and resist chemo- and radiotherapy. These cells have been postulated to be the basis for some of the difficulties in treating cancer, and therefore, numerous approaches have been developed to specifically target and eliminate CSC in diverse types of cancer, including breast cancer. Spontaneously occurring mammary tumors in canines share clinical and molecular similarities with the human counterpart, making the dog a potentially powerful model for the study of human breast cancer and clinical trials. Studies focused on canine mammary CSC might therefore enhance our understanding of the biology and possible treatment of the disease in both dogs and humans. In this review, we discuss various approaches currently in use to isolate and characterize canine mammary CSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.