Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27993130›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Computational approach to predict species-specific type III secretion system (T3SS) effectors using single and multiple genomes.

Christopher K Hobbs, Vanessa L Porter, Maxwell L S Stow, Bupe A Siame, Herbert H Tsang, Ka Yin Leung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational prediction of secreted proteins in gram-negative bacteria.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Virulence · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher K HobbsApplied Research Laboratory, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, Canada, V2Y 1Y1.
Vanessa L PorterDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, Canada, V2Y 1Y1.
Maxwell L S StowApplied Research Laboratory, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, Canada, V2Y 1Y1.
Bupe A SiameDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, Canada, V2Y 1Y1.
Herbert H TsangApplied Research Laboratory, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, Canada, V2Y 1Y1. herbert.tsang@twu.ca.
Ka Yin LeungDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, Canada, V2Y 1Y1. kayin.leung@twu.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany gram-negative bacteria use type III secretion systems (T3SSs) to translocate effector proteins into host cells. T3SS effectors can give some bacteria a competitive edge over others within the same environment and can help bacteria to invade the host cells and allow them to multiply rapidly within the host. Therefore, developing efficient methods to identify effectors scattered in bacterial genomes can lead to a better understanding of host-pathogen interactions and ultimately to important medical and biotechnological applications.

resultsWe used 21 genomic and proteomic attributes to create a precise and reliable T3SS effector prediction method called Genome Search for Effectors Tool (GenSET). Five machine learning algorithms were trained on effectors selected from different organisms and a trained (voting) algorithm was then applied to identify other effectors present in the genome testing sets from the same (GenSET Phase 1) or different (GenSET Phase 2) organism. Although a select group of attributes that included the codon adaptation index, probability of expression in inclusion bodies, N-terminal disorder, and G + C content (filtered) were better at discriminating between positive and negative sets, algorithm performance was better when all 21 attributes (unfiltered) were used. Performance scores (sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve) from GenSET Phase 1 were better than those reported for six published methods. More importantly, GenSET Phase 1 ranked more known effectors (70.3%) in the top 40 ranked proteins and predicted 10-80% more effectors than three available programs in three of the four organisms tested. GenSET Phase 2 predicted 43.8% effectors in the top 40 ranked proteins when tested on four related or unrelated organisms. The lower prediction rates from GenSET Phase 2 may be due to the presence of different translocation signals in effectors from different T3SS families.

conclusionsThe species-specific GenSET Phase 1 method offers an alternative approach to T3SS effector prediction that can be used with other published programs to improve effector predictions. Additionally, our approach can be applied to predict effectors of other secretion systems as long as these effectors have translocation signals embedded in their sequences.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenome, BacterialGenomicsType III Secretion SystemsAlgorithmsBase CompositionGram-Negative BacteriaReproducibility of ResultsType III Secretion SystemsEffector predictionGram-negative bacteriaMachine learningType III secretion system

Identifiers

PMID27993130
PMCPMC5168842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.