Trial reportPloS one2016
Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Evaluating Biliary Atresia in Infants and Neonates.
Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Scoring System Based on Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Blood Biochemistry Tests for Diagnosing Biliary Atresia in Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in the grading of liver fibrosis associated with congenital ductal plate malformations.Polish journal of radiology · 2023Article
- [Diagnostic Imaging of Biliary Atresia].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2022Review
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiation of Biliary Atresia and Grading of Hepatic Fibrosis in Infants with Cholestasis.Korean journal of radiology · 2021Article
- The role of diffusion tensor imaging of the liver in children with autoimmune hepatitis.Polish journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Assessment of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters of Hepatic Parenchyma for Differentiation of Biliary Atresia from Alagille Syndrome.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreliminary studies have shown that diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is helpful in evaluating liver disorders. However, there is no published literature on the use of DTI in the diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA). This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of the liver average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) measured using DTI for BA in neonates and infants.
methodsFifty-nine patients with infant jaundice were included in this study. DTI was performed with b factors of 0 and 1000 s/mm2. Liver fibrosis in the BA group was determined and graded (F0, F1, F2, F3, F4) based on the pathological findings. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of DTI for BA.
resultsThe ADC value was significantly lower in the BA group [(1.262±0.127)×10-3 mm2/s] than in the non-BA group [(1.430±0.149)×10-3 mm2/s, (P<0.001)]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.805±0.058 (P<0.001) for ADC. With a cut-off value of 1.317×10-3 mm2/s, ADC achieved a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 81.5% for the differential diagnosis of BA and non-BA. In the BA group, the ADC value was significantly correlated with fibrotic stage. Further analysis showed that the ADC value of stage F0 was significantly higher than that of stages F1, F2, F3 and F4, whereas there were no significant differences among stages F1, F2, F3 and F4.
conclusionHepatic ADC measured with DTI can be used as an adjunct to other noninvasive imaging methods in the differential diagnosis of BA and non-BA. ADC was helpful in detecting liver fibrosis but not in differentiating the fibrotic grades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.