Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27991907›Full record

ReviewLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2017

Immunomodulating property of MAPK inhibitors: from translational knowledge to clinical implementation.

Mario Mandalà, Francesco De Logu, Barbara Merelli, Romina Nassini, Daniela Massi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cell-Based Therapies for Solid Tumors: Challenges and Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The KRASMolecular cancer therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mario MandalàUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Francesco De LoguUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Barbara MerelliUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Romina NassiniUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Daniela MassiDivision of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of metastatic melanoma was radically changed by the introduction of inhibitors of BRAF, an oncogene mutated in 40-50% of patients. Another area of advancement was the use of immunotherapy, and specifically, immune checkpoint inhibitors. There is compelling evidence that oncogenic BRAF, in addition to driving melanoma proliferation, differentiation and survival, induces T-cell suppression directly through the secretion of inhibitory cytokines or through membrane expression of co-inhibitory molecules such as the PD-1 ligands PD-L1 or PD-L2. Furthermore, the presence of oncogenic BRAF leads to an immune suppressive phenotype characterized by the presence of inhibitory immune cells such as regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, or tumor-associated macrophages, which can in turn inhibit the function of tumor-infiltrating T cells. Growing evidence suggests that, in addition to their established molecular mechanism of action, the therapeutic efficacy of BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors relies on additional factors that affect the tumor-host interactions, including the enhancement of melanoma antigen expression and the increase in immune response against tumor cells. Focus of the present review is to summarize the off target mechanisms of response to BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors and the synergy between targeted therapy and immunotherapy as the biological source to open a window of strategic opportunities for the design of new exciting clinical trials.

Indexed as

HumansImmunotherapyMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMelanomaModels, BiologicalMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTranslational Research, BiomedicalProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID27991907
OpenAlexW2565520898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.